I'm not sure whether this issue specifically pertains to my gen-1 Mazda3 (or my car specifically), 'older' cars that don't have all the fancy electronics or hybrid systems current ones do, but I'd thought I'd ask this anyway:
My car tends to go through batteries in about 4-5 years. About average for a car, however, I wondered if this could be stretched by some means other than taking it out for a spin more often.
Whilst in recent years, I've done a low annual mileage (only 2,000 - 5,000 miles), 95%+ of that is made up of regular runs of 10-15 miles each way to a nearby town (shopping trips) plus often two weeks driving down to the West Country for holiday (up to 1000 miles) and the occasional 35 mile each way visit to my parents. All on decent speed roads.
This means the car currently sits idle quite a bit, but I tend to deliberately use it more often when the weather is cold/damp in winter (once a week) and less so in summer (once a fortnight). I almost never do short trips from cold.
Other than using it more, is there any benefit in, say, turning the headlights on for a reasonable time during the trips even if the conditions don't warrant it, because it forces the alternator to charge the battery? When I've needed to use the car to commute and done around the 7-10,000 miles pa, the battery hasn't lasted any longer, despite me using it 5 days a week for decent length trips.
I did hear *somewhere* (I can't remember where) someone saying that normal driving without a big current draw (such as the lights) may not automatically get the alternator topping up the battery. When my last battery failed in the summer, the RAC man checked the alternator and found it to be working fine.
|