Hard to believe the engineers did not for-see any of this nonsense.
I suspect they did - I think HJ said in one of the replies on this issue (there are 3) that JLR used the platform from the old LR Freelander as the basis and its configuration mean they couldn't close-couple the DPF due to that the engines they were using. I would have thought that the engineers brought this to the attention of their managers, but the bean counters over-ruled them for changing things because it cost more money.
They may have saved on R&D by using the old platform, but are now literally paying the price of that (IMHO) stupid decision by having to shell out for many repairs and lost business due to the poor reliability of the brand and specific issues like this that are design flaws that cannot be fixed on the cars that have them.
Of course, this is not helped by them going full-on diesel and up-market just when diesels were starting to wane in popularity (before Dieselgate) due to this very issue and when world economic fortunes started to reduce, especially in richer nations. Bad calls all round, and to me, doesn't reflect at all well on the management at this firm.
|