I may be biased but I would still say the merc driver was mostly at fault. Of course my son isn't completely blame free and yes, he should have been more alert, but I actually worded the last part a bit wrong.
Apparently, the merc had pulled backwards and was clear of the lane, while my son was still quite far back. Merc made no move to pull out and was standing there (so even if he had realised merc was doing a 3 point turn, you'd assume merc had seen him and was giving way, surely?) and my son was going about 20-25 mph. The scratches start behind the front wheel, which means the merc must have started pulling out when he was right in front of him, no?
Honestly I'm just worried about what insurance companies will say, if the other driver decides to make a claim.
It’s hard to be sure from your description, no offence but describing accidents is not easy. The above suggests the Merc pulled out from the side, and hit the side of your son’s car. That to me suggests fault by the Merc. However, without a dashcam it would be hard to prove, and the descriptions given by the two parties will influence the outcome. So you might just get 50/50 by default. The earlier comment about defensive driving is a good one. I’ve lost count of the number of times a wally has pulled out in front of me, or done some other numpty move, and I avoided an accident because I was prepared eg foot above the brake, slowing, going wider or even stopping. Get him to do an advanced driving course, no need to do the test, it’s worth doing. In short, assume other road users are idiots/unsafe and drive accordingly. Of course most aren’t, but it protects you from the idiots.>
Edited by Leif on 23/02/2019 at 11:14
|