Thank you for your input Simon.
My main aim was to try to find out if there was a way not to accept the car back, not for the damaged to be accessed for costing of repair/ write off.
If it was mine there would always be a nagging doubt that the structural damage/ alinement was not fully corrected.
The car was stressed between the main structural member on the passenger side to the rear drivers side wheel, damaging both.
That loading (by a dustbin lorry) transfered through the back end of the Merc. How many other structural / non structural components have transmitted that load? A load completely different from any normally occuring in driving.
So the insurance company decide to repair, all new components rear drivers corner, replace the rear section of the structural member just above the exhaust and replace bumper/lights and b******* bits. check and tweek it on a jig.
All now seems fine, alinement bang on etc.
That car is not as good as it was, items have been stressed and likely bent that are still on it. Corrosion and fatigue failure is much more likely. I would get shot of it as soon as I got it back.
The point of my post was if you can refuse to accept a car back, an angle to recieve the cash value instead of the car.
|