Saw this stuff in Halfords,"Classic" 20W50 API SE/CC in a nice tin.
Now I like old thick oil, and I don't discount the alleged downside of newer specs with lower zinc levels. (I use SJ routinely in my 1986 car and would use SG or SH if I had it).
However, I'm unclear what the advantage might be in going as retro as SE, apart from price. I thought this might be priced as a niche product, but it was only 18 quid for 5L IIRC. Quite surprising.
It seems to be a re-branded Comma product, so should be OK, BUT its only got 600-800ppm from a datasheet I saw, perhaps a bit low for flat tappet engines.
www.commaoil.com/productsguide/view/6/262/CLA20505L
The similarly pitched "Castrol Classic" is SF (later, but still not the SG or SH I might expect), and costs nearly 3 times as much.
msdspds.castrol.com/bpglis/FusionPDS.nsf/Files/4E3...f
No info on the Zinc level. Given the niche its aimed at, that's surprisingly coy, even suspect.
This article, written in 1996:-
www.volvoclub.org.uk/castrol.shtml
says "Oils for modern engines comply to the latest API ratings of SG and SH and are ideal for the design of a modern engine, i.e.: use of neoprene seals, high delivery pumps, narrow oil galleries, high revving with overall tighter machine tolerances."
This implies that SG and SH are incompatible with pre-1980 engines.
I wonder why?
With the possible exception of neoprene seals, all those factors would seem to be mostly affected by viscosity, rather than API grade.
Any educated guesses?
Academic at the moment but might get relevent if I move back to the UK and can find and afford an old car or motorcycle.
Edited by edlithgow on 28/08/2018 at 19:19
|