We have had cars wil basic A/C and Climate (single and 2 zone) and there is a big difference.
Basic A/C is better than nothing but as noted above the cycling of the compressor is noticable at idle and in one car (Ford Puma) you could even feel the compressor cycling at 70 mph on the motorway. You need to adjust the temperature manually not only as the outside temp increases but also when the sun comes out/goes back in and sometimes with the speed of the car.
Climate is much better, set the temp on the display and the car will adjust the system to provide that temp. If it needs a lot of cooling you get it, if it doesn't the system only provides what is needed and saves fuel.
But while some insist that dual zone is better I personally cannot see the point in a small space like a car. Its not like a house where you might like to set one room hotter than another, in a car the air mixes all the time while you are driving making the interior one temp like it or not. My Superb had an option for 3 zone climate giving the rear passengers control over the temp. Why? most of the air that circulates into the back comes form the front and they have no control over that. Imagine having 2 or more kids in the back argueing over the setting, total nightmare.
For me climate is an option I will always tick (if its not standard). Last car I bought with A/C was the Leon and that was a dealer stock car with a great deal. Always wished it had climate (it was my intention to specify it) but the deal just about made the lack of climate acceptable (climate was about £300 extra but a factory order would have cost near £2000 more and a 4 month wait). But in truth I would not do it again.
|