What do you think of Elon Musk? Have your say | No thanks
- Dorset123
Why do people think that a hire car is there right after an accident and are quite happy to run up a £2920 bill and expect someone else to to pay it. BP.
Our car was written off last year when another driver went through a junction and despite the Police saying he was 100% at fault we decide that it wasn't a good idea to have a hire car as we could end up paying for it. It took over 7 months for the other insurance company to decide that they were to blame for the accident and of course we would have had to pay the car hire up to that point.
People need to think before jumping in and hiring cars even if they think the other driver is at fault.
ONLY HIRE A CAR IF YOU ARE WILLING TO PAY IT.
Honest John’s Motoring Agony Column 05-05-2018 Part 2 - glidermania

I understand your point but what are you supposed to do if you are a one car household? Then you have no car. Most people would find it difficult to be without a car for a week never mind couple of months. The answer is to establish at the outset exactly who is paying if the other insurance company does not.

Honest John’s Motoring Agony Column 05-05-2018 Part 2 - gordonbennet

If it's a cut and dried case where the other driver is at fault, then contacting the other driver's insurance company directly will often prove fruitful, as they will bend over backwards to get you a (admittedly fairly basic) courtesy car and your car repaired and returned to you asap.

Unfortunately so many people cannot see the bigger picture, and if involved in an accident not their fault milk it for all its worth, ie brand new equivalent credit hire vehicle to pose in for a month or more and then some juicy undeserved compo down the line, easily putting another zero on the total claim cost, then they wonder why their insurance renewal is knocking on the door of 4 figures.

- TeeJay Slim
I have been working for a large car insurer and I can tell you this. Your insurer wil coax you into a like or like replacement car. In reality you have been referred to these sharks in exchange for a kickback the insurer makes. You are then unknowingly signed into a credit hire agreement. Think of it as taking out a credit card then maxing it out on hire charges. The bigger the hire bill the bigger kickback to the insurer. While we all concern ourselves with reducing personal injury claims, the credit hire companies are making an absolute killing with the average cost of hire claim running into the thousands.

As car insurance is a legal requirement, it needs to be nationalised and we need to pay for it like we pay for N.I. These private insurance companies are profiting from something which is compulsory upon the car drivers.

The whole industry is grossly unfair. If your car gets damaged by someone else while parked unattended and you claim from your own insurer, you will be penalty in your premium because you are seen as underwriting risk. Just plain pathetic!
- glidermania
I am majorly disappointed that HJ continues to promote Japanese cars in view of the fact Japan flagrantly ingores the International Whaling Commission's ban on whaling, especially in the South Atlantic Ocean Sanctuary.

I appreciate many people are not bothered by the IWC's ban nor Japan blasting whales with explosive tipped harpoons then allowing them to die a slow drawn out death but, these are probably the same people belly aching over the really trivial and tedious VW 'dieselgate scandal.' We do not even treat animals slaughtered in the UK to be treated like this.

You may be could make an exception for Japanese manufacturers whose cars are made in the UK being exempt although personally, I would not buy anything from them.
Honest John’s Motoring Agony Column 05-05-2018 Part 2 - Engineer Andy
I am majorly disappointed that HJ continues to promote Japanese cars in view of the fact Japan flagrantly ingores the International Whaling Commission's ban on whaling, especially in the South Atlantic Ocean Sanctuary. I appreciate many people are not bothered by the IWC's ban nor Japan blasting whales with explosive tipped harpoons then allowing them to die a slow drawn out death but, these are probably the same people belly aching over the really trivial and tedious VW 'dieselgate scandal.' We do not even treat animals slaughtered in the UK to be treated like this. You may be could make an exception for Japanese manufacturers whose cars are made in the UK being exempt although personally, I would not buy anything from them.

By your words, anyone who doesn't actively campaign against whaling should be boycotted. There are MANY things that countries around the world allow their people and firms to do that are bad (to me at least), never mind the state-sanctioned nasties.

Many countries in the Middle East are fighting proxy wars and often killing thousand (if not many more) civilians in the name of religion, dogma, ego or all three, yet I don't see you wanting to boycott their oil sales, never mind what the likes of Russia & China seems (in my opinion) to be doing as regards bullying neighbours, etc, or how Venezuela is treating its own citizens, for example.

Germany has been just found out to be, with the full knowledge of the EU Commission, engaging with Russia in an apparently illegal 'sweetheart' deal for natural gas that means it gets a huge discount, paid for by higher prices for other European nations, and often ones that (to me at least) Russia has its 'eye on' to regain influence by bullying tactics and more. Why not call for a boycott of German cars in that case?

Japanese car makers make cars - they don't hunt whales. You may find some actively support environmental campaigns, or at the very least employees do. Don't tar another nation with one brush. Far better to politely (after all, that's what most Japanese people value) persuade the Japanese people to stop whaling by showing them hard facts about the damage its doing. They are a democratic country and are more likely to listen to reason than shouty protests and calls for boycotts, which tend to only work on dictatorships.

Honest John’s Motoring Agony Column 05-05-2018 Part 2 - jchinuk

Whale oil was traditionally used as a lubricant in automatic transmissions, certainly in the US, and heavy machinery.

- Duncan Turner
Car insurance is not what it was. At one time there were underwriters who calculated the premium to cover you, but today it has been computerised and there is a premium based on a limited set of conditions. That is why there are now so many new insurance brands all targetting their niche market. If your details do not fit their target then they will not offer you a quote, quite often if you honestly declare a claim within 5 years then they are not interested. So much for choice you finish up using the expensive brand where they may still use underwriters.
- jchinuk
Driving automatics, while I agree with your views on 'two footed' driving, surely the traditional 'double width' brake pedal encourages the 'one footed' (and potentially dangerous) style?