I have no advice for the OP at all as i have no leagl knowledge at all, other than as Concrete suggests, this is a valuable lesson to learn from, and should be applied to the usual forked tongue spiel from sales people, ranging from politicians ( and their media lackeys) to the lad trying to sell you an extended warranty on a washing machine, believe nothing they say.
Compare with son and DiL's recent experience.
DiL's CRV gets hit in the child nursery car park, third party honest and owns up, third party insurer contacts asap, please can we collect your car and supply you a courtesy car madam, yes but it can't be a little standard car due to rear facing car seat which we only fit in the back, no problem madeam we'll drop off an equivalent rental car (at our expense) and collect yours, fine.
bear in mind this is all the third party's insurer, DiL's insurer only notified for information purposes
new Rav 4 turns up, CRV goes to repair shop, returned in about 5 days and Rav 4 collected, everyone happy, third party insurer have mitigated their costs, innocent party have been only slightly inconvenienced and not one low life shark has made a bean from the mishap.
how it should play out
As regards the frankly ridiculous £1200 a week hire rip off, i'm not surprised that at fault insurers who end up paying for this scam are fighting back and refusing to pay, i support those who will not play this silly game, what with deliberate delays to milk the hire charges then a handy injury claim on top.
We all have a duty IMO to mitigate our losses when an accident happens, just because someone else is most likely (but you never know) to be at fault does not mean that it should be looked on as a nice little jolly for the innocent party, with bonuses of a new upper market car and ahandy bit of compo just for a bent wing or bumper.
We all end up paying for this nasty little racket in the end.
Edited by gordonbennet on 23/10/2015 at 19:52
|