Any advice would be much appreciated as I am at my wits end.
I am nearly 12 months into an isurance claim relating to a 3 car shunt on the motorway of which I was the middle car.
The car in front of me braked suddenly, I managed to stop just a few feet from him and was hit from behind and pushed into the car in front.
My car was almost a write-off with extensive damage to the front but minimal damage to the rear. The other cars were damaged a little, but told by the police that they were able to drive off.
The driver behind is since claiming that I had already hit the first car when he ran into me.
My uninsured loss solicitor is saying that there isn't much hope for my recovering my excess etc. as the photographic evidence doesn't support my case - as you would expect more damage to the front of the third car. This despite the driver of the first car referring to 'an impact' not two.
I'm certainly no expert but I do know that cars are designed to crumple at the front and be stong at the rear to protect the occupants. This explains the minimal damage to the car in front and the damage pattern to my car. However, I'm struggling to explain the lack of substantial damage to the car that hit me.
I don't know whether I was hit as the car behind was at the end of braking and therefore 'poked' into the car in front. I do remember that split second of relief at stopping though before I was hit from behind.
If anyone can help me explain why the third car wasn't damaged more then I would really appreciate it. Thanks.
|