Notwithstanding the merits or the possible illegality of a head up display in the drivers forward field of vision, this device has a fundamental problem and as such is going to be ignored by car manufacturers.
Driving a car for maximum fuel economy is actually a complex formula, it is NOT simply a case of sticking to a constant speed, which is served well by cruise control. For instance, for best economy, accelerating to a given speed requires knowledge of the fuel efficiency / demand / torque / engine speed characteristics of the engine. Simply accelerating slowly is NOT an efficient use of fuel. Likewise decelerating for maximum economy requires complex read ahead of the road and an appropriate strategy to be adopted. World class hyper milers know all this and this simple device does little to aid anyone and as pointed out is actually a driver distraction device, bear in mind the state of our litigation crazy world, should your device be implied in an accident...
This device appears to be a simple standalone accelerometer, and as such is affected by gradients (i.e gravity) as well linear acceleration, and is unable to distinguish the slope of hills from linear acceleration. Manufacturers could implement an accurate "g" meter by simple differentiation of the road speed signal, but no one chooses to do this. Ask yourself why?
Looking at your speedometer would be more accurate and costs nothing and use cruise control where appropriate and safe to do so...
Edited by brum on 28/12/2014 at 19:41
|