Volvo parts have never been cheap, but in the pre-Ford days the vehicles were durable and the overall parts requirement fairly modest. The vehicles were also simple (crude?) by current standards.
A current Volvo is a sophisticated machine, so designed in order to compete with its rivals. The market penetration of the brand is fairly low and there is consequently little competition in the form of pattern parts or specialist independents (although there are some).
The possibility of using the brand as an after-sales cash cow by its current owners may, in my view, be too good for them to miss. My observations suggest that this practice is occuring and that if you choose this product, you need to examine carefully the source of parts and labour in order to keep costs in line. The process may be more trouble than the perceived advantages of the brand suggest.
As an owner of a "rubbish badge" VAG product, I find the worldwide market penetration of its running gear to be such that the choice of spares is astonishingly wide - from China upwards. Obviously, you buy with care, but competition has the magic effect of keeping the OE parts prices down. I have found that the cost of service spares and the very few replacement parts needed for this vehicle has been unexpectedly low.
I have made a further comment on the D5 engine in "Technical".
659.
Edited by 659FBE on 22/01/2014 at 15:04
|