"As the Parking, as opposed to Penalty, notices are unenforceable in law what is a court case going to relate to, broadly speaking?"
As I said in my earlier post, any court case in which the parking company makes a claim agaonst a driver/registered keeper hinges on the alleged breach of a contract that is deemed to exist between the driver and the company based on signage displayed at the site setting out the terms of the contract. Supposedly, if the driver parks their car, they must have read the contract and, by parking, agreed to it.
Based on this, the parking company claims money from the driver, but this may only be awarded by the court if the company can show it has suffered a loss from the alleged breach of contract.
So the parking company must (a) prove the signage was adequate and (b) that an actual loss has resulted.
Considering these companies routinely attempt to get substantial amounts from people it looks unlikely that these amounts would be seen by a court as representing a reasonable reimbursement for their losses - assuming they could even prove they had sustained any loss at all.
As for the signage, things like the wording, the legibility and visibility, the number of signs and their location could all be scrutinised by a court.
Edited by FP on 30/10/2013 at 10:59
|