DVD said, "Mens rea does not feature in speeding."
As a layman interested in the law I had to look up "mens rea", which is Latin for "guilty mind". In law, apparently, it covers concepts like a guilty or wrongful purpose, a criminal intent, or guilty knowledge and wilfulness.
In the case of the OP, I guess its significance is that in breaking the speed limit an illegal act has been committed (the Latin or legal phrase would be "actus reus", meaning "guilty act") and that is an absolute offence, irrespective of the thought processes of the person committing the offence. So, believing yourself not to be speeding when caught (because of a faulty speedometer) is irrelevant.
It crosses my mind that the OP might have some sort of case against his employer, but on the basis of something else entirely, like loss of earnings as a result of disqualification - but this is unlikely to be the scenario. (Or perhaps not, as there is the possibility of further speeding offences coming to light.)
I hope I have got that right.
Edited by FP on 30/08/2013 at 15:33
|