We now have had the arbitration
1. Arbitrator stated the MB had no obligation to fix the problem as it was out of warranty
2. I stated that the car being out of warranty was not an absolute defence
3. MB confirmed that as a good will gesture they carried out a diagnosis and found the gearbox was faulty. However they were not obliged to prove how or why this had happened. It was up to me to prove that.
4. Arbitrator stated that I had yet not suffered a financial loss
5. I stated that I now had an asset which was not fit for purpose intended
6. Arbitrator stated that I would need to have the gearbox dismantled to ascertain the precise nature of the fault and why this fault had developed. This is what the judge needs. I would need to prove to him of a premature failure of a bearing or whatever.
7. Arbitrator stated that MB could not be sure how the vehicle had been driven since I purchased it.
8. Arbitrator stated that I would need to prove that the fault with the gearbox existed when I purchased the vehicle.
9. MB would not budge on the offer of 50% contribution towards the fixing of the vehicle.
I stated that if the gearbox had failed 6 months earlier, then MB would have had to replace it FOC
All in all I felt the arbitrator seemed to want me to take up their offer.
She put in a lot of negative comments relating to what the Judge will want at the full hearing, and that I would probably fail in my claim
So that's were we are.
Court hearing at the end of August.
|