So to make sure I've got this straight your partner's car was in an accident that wrote it off.
The driver admitted liability and their insurance paid out.
There's now a claim that the car that did the damage was a clone.
How on earth did your partner's insurer accept the settlement without some sort of due diligence? How on earth did the cloned car's owner, who was presumably the Keeper, not know at the time that a claim against him was being made and then settled.
There's a strong smell of fish about the whole thing.
Your partner may need legal advice, the sort you have to pay for, but I can't see how his insurers are blameless.
Has the issue been escalated beyond the front of house bods who answer the phone at his insurer?
|