“ My personal opinion is that this is another non-problem invented to line the pockets of a shark-infested pool of lawyers.” My opinion also.
Rarely are 'enquiries' of decent use and especially good value for money. Rather like on episodes of 'Yes, Minister' or 'Yes, Prime Minister', politicians will know that its all about who the chairperson is and the remit of the enquiry or report.
The outcome will mostly, if nigh on always be known from the outset of it being set up, so the rest is theartre, as you say, to line the pockets of and give free publicity to lawyers and other hanger-oners, plus lots of nice copy for the media.
Sadly, it also appears that we (via higher costs for the rest of us) have to now pay for people who don't bother reading Ts & Cs, ask reasonable questions or, if they don't have much knowledge or capability, have someone who does with them to help / advise them.
I also believe that this enquiry / report will be used as a smokescreen to deflect from the fallout when (not if) the inevitable crash occurs (I think it's already started with the sizeable increase in depreciation of cars, especially EVs) due to millions of people defaulting on car loans (especially PCP deals) because so many debts get 'rolled over' (getting higher and higher) to the next purchase.
This combined with whenever the coming economic depression (held back by very creative money printing) finally arrives. It'll be sub-prime home loans on steroids if you include everything else, especially if the housing market collapses as probably would.
|