That great damage can be done to engine and electrical systems by driving through water deeper than that specified by the manufacturer is beyond doubt.
If a flood is (or appears to be) evidently deeper by reference to kerbs, roadside vegetation or other flooded immobile vehicles, (in my view) the driver is wholly at fault, an id....t, and should not be an insurance beneficiary.
Where there is no depth evidence, there are three possible options - (a) take a risk, (b) walk into the water to ascertain the actual depth, or (c) find an alternative route.
In (a) and (b) the driver should take responsibility for their decision - if damage ensues pick up some or all of the cost - the % may depend on circumstances but a minimum of 50% and in some cases 100%.
I do not want my insurance premiums increased due to the plain stooppidity of others!!
|