What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
Economy run - Andrew-T

Pug 207SW diesel 1.6 HDi, 83K miles, no DPF. Last Thursday did round trip Fordsham - Shrewsbury - Wenlock - Craven Arms and return by A49, 140 miles, mostly A roads with about 20% B roads, mostly light traffic, with short hold-up on Shrewsbury east bypass. Total 4 hours driving - I neither bimble nor hustle.

After nearly 15 years with this car ** I have found that its mpg calculation is fairly accurate, I am used to getting 65-67 mpg on this kind of journey, but on this occasion it managed 70mpg, the figure in the car's handbook for inter-urban driving (4.0 litres/100km = 70.5). I thought handbook figures were not usually to be believed ?

** it should still be in HJ's Real MPG list.

Edited by Andrew-T on 26/08/2023 at 15:27

Economy run - Metropolis.
That is impressive. I have long considered anything over 20mpg acceptable, anything over 30 economical. I do generally find I can equal or better the manufacturer’s spec for mpg so maybe they are being conservative.
Economy run - Adampr
That is impressive. I have long considered anything over 20mpg acceptable, anything over 30 economical. I do generally find I can equal or better the manufacturer’s spec for mpg so maybe they are being conservative.

What the hell are you driving??

Economy run - Xileno

That's seriously impressive. I had a Megane 1.5 dci (no dpf) and I think the best I saw was 58mpg on the display. I never bothered with a brim to brim test. I never drove it with economy in mind but never drove it hard either.

Economy run - Steveieb

Apart from the complexity of the emission control equipment in modern diesels , does this account for the reduction in MPG ?

My now departed A4 TDI PD would approach these sort of MPG but not quite being a heavier car with much better crash protection .

Much loved model in Eastern Europe it could be making its way over there right now.

Economy run - Maxime.

My hubby had an Xj v12 and we were lucky to get 15mpg.. It went when we got married.

Economy run - expat

I am getting around 14mpg in town driving a 6 cylinder 4lt Ford Falcon. Long runs in the country get about 20mpg. It is on LPG so I am paying around A$1.29 per litre which is about 66 of your pence.

Economy run - bathtub tom
Much loved model in Eastern Europe it could be making its way over there right now.

Nicked was it?................................................................;>)

Economy run - Metropolis.
As a general rule, nothing with less than 5 cylinders.
Economy run - Engineer Andy
That is impressive. I have long considered anything over 20mpg acceptable, anything over 30 economical. I do generally find I can equal or better the manufacturer’s spec for mpg so maybe they are being conservative.

What the hell are you driving??

Something American and V8 perhaps?

Economy run - Adampr
That is impressive. I have long considered anything over 20mpg acceptable, anything over 30 economical. I do generally find I can equal or better the manufacturer’s spec for mpg so maybe they are being conservative.

What the hell are you driving??

Something American and V8 perhaps?

In fairness, I used to have a Toyota Hilux Surf. It was 3.0 petrol V6 with a torque converter and I never got to 20mpg. Driving from North London to a friend's place in Ripon (north Yorkshire) with a full 60 litre tank necessitated a stop for fuel on the way.

Now I think of it, perhaps that's why I'm not fussed about EV range...

Economy run - badbusdriver

I once got an average mpg of around 70mpg showing on the display of a 4th gen Golf turbo diesel. This was a pre-PD TD, a 110bhp GT TDI. I was making a conscious effort to drive efficiently (but not to the point of holding up other traffic). Can't remember the exact figure (it was around 20 years ago!), either very high 60's or 70 point something. This was just going by the trip computer, not sure how accurate they were.

When I first started cleaning windows I had a 3.5 tonne swb high roof Iveco Daily (2.3 turbo diesel, 96bhp I think) and used a 1000 litre water tank. I thought the 29mpg average not too bad for something that size, shape and weight.

Economy run - SLO76
I found SWMBO’s Honda HRV 1.6 DTEC particularly economical, often hitting 70mpg on longer runs when driven sensibly. I highly rate this engine in any car it’s found in, even the fairly sizeable CRV we had with the same engine was averaging 56mpg and easily hitting well over 60mpg on runs. We never had any problems with either engine.
Economy run - skidpan

The wifes last 2 cars, the Fabia 110 TSi PS and the Note DIG-S 98 PS have both been able to achieve just over 60 mpg on journeys over about 70miles driven with no particular consideration for economy.

Back in the 90's we had a Golf TSi 90 PS which was about the same size as both the Fabia and Note (the Note was incredibly spacious for a compact MPV) and despite being highly regarded for its economy it could not match the figures we get now from petrol cars of a similar size. Even the Superb TSi 150 we had could manage about 52 mpg on a holiday run, not much less than the Golf TDi used to do.

Take the extra 10 pence or so per litre for diesel and the win for a modern petrol is even clearer.

Economy run - Bromptonaut

The wifes last 2 cars, the Fabia 110 TSi PS and the Note DIG-S 98 PS have both been able to achieve just over 60 mpg on journeys over about 70miles driven with no particular consideration for economy.

My similarly powered Fabia will show 60+ mpg on longer journeys but it drops smartly on the continent cruising at 130kph. Equally clear is the way it goes up in long period at 50 in roadworks/all lane smart m/way.

Diesel Roomster occasionally got to 70mpg driven carefully.

HDi/115 Berlingo attains upper fifties but lucky to make 35 towing 1300kg of caravan.

Economy run - Andrew-T

Take the extra 10 pence or so per litre for diesel and the win for a modern petrol is even clearer.

Actually, on the run which started this thread, I noticed at least two filling stations selling petrol and diesel at the same price.

Economy run - badbusdriver

Because my wife's granny is in hospital (and has been for some time now), I've had to do a few runs to Inverness (from Peterhead), today was the fourth. With this thread still in mind, I was wondering what mpg the Ignis would do on the journey. I reset the trip computer before we left Inverness (forgot to before we left Peterhead), it was showing 62.8mpg when we got home.

That is just under 108 miles on single carriageway roads apart from three places with a section of overtaking lane (no more than two miles in total). Where traffic allowed I was doing 60-65mph (accelerating hard up to about 75mph on the overtaking lanes), but there was a stretch of maybe 30-40 miles where, due to traffic and lack of overtaking opportunities, we were trundling along at 40-50mph. As well as that, the journey does involve going through numerous towns and villages (with 30mph limits and stop start traffic), some very twisty sections and some steep hills.

So as much as I am growing to hate the trip(!), I'm happy with the economy managed by the Ignis. Though to be clear, those figures are just what the trip computer says. I don't care enough to do in depth brim to brim analysis!

Economy run - mcb100
I’m immediately stymied on the closest I have to a regular commute (Oldham to Leeds) by a lump of limestone and millstone grit called the Pennines. I get on the M62 at junction 21 and immediately start what I believe is a 700 foot climb to the highest point of any motorway in the UK at junction 22.
Economy never really recovers after that, my 1.6 diesel Megane showing, typically, just under 60mpg.
Economy run - JonestHon

Had a hired 2023 i10 with a dreadful 1.2 four pot mated to even more awful robotic auto box.

Had to rev the sh**t out of it to keep up with traffic, managed 42 mpg average, not far off from my IS250 v6 that will do 40 mph average on long runs.

Economy run - badbusdriver

Had a hired 2023 i10 with a dreadful 1.2 four pot mated to even more awful robotic auto box.

Had to rev the sh**t out of it to keep up with traffic, managed 42 mpg average, not far off from my IS250 v6 that will do 40 mph average on long runs.

Our Ignis also has a n/a 1.2 four pot mated to the same kind of single clutch automated manual (AGS). But it is 140kg lighter (according to the figures on this websit) and has an extra 6bhp (post facelift versions are all MHEV and have the same 83bhp as the i10. They are also heavier though still appreciably lighter than the i10).

I tend to use the manual mode, especially if trying to push on, because the AGS box is so dim witted.

Economy run - Ethan Edwards

Just to put your mpg figures in perspective.

Mokka-e...4.9m per kwh the MPGe that's Mile's per gallon equivalent is 196mpg.

Tesla does let's say upwards of 250 miles on the equivalent of a shade over three gallons.

Not knocking heroic efforts to get towards 70mpg but it's a different league.

Economy run - SLO76

Just to put your mpg figures in perspective.

Mokka-e...4.9m per kwh the MPGe that's Mile's per gallon equivalent is 196mpg.

Tesla does let's say upwards of 250 miles on the equivalent of a shade over three gallons.

Not knocking heroic efforts to get towards 70mpg but it's a different league.

Since returning from our one off long distance EV adventure I have yet to pay a single penny for any of its energy usage. Daily commute and usual family related running about has cost zilch, despite SWMBO’s heavy right foot.

Edited by SLO76 on 29/08/2023 at 22:03

Economy run - Andrew-T

Not knocking heroic efforts to get towards 70mpg but it's a different league.

Not only a different league, but a different basis for calculation. Propelling a ton-plus vehicle along a ribbon of tarmac while overcoming rolling and wind resistance requires energy. In an ICE car all of that comes from liquid fuel. Your Mokka is just the same, but you simply don't see some of your energy sources. As you say, it's an 'equivalent', that's all.

Economy run - Ethan Edwards

OK what energy sources other than the power from the Traction battery do you imagine I use? Hamster power?

It's equivalent because energy moves the car from a to b. Same as yours. The energy can be measured. Petrol has a known amount of energy too. Energy measured in kw. So a direct comparison is easy. I get 196 per "gallon".

Economy run - Andrew-T

OK what energy sources other than the power from the Traction battery do you imagine I use? Hamster power?

It's equivalent because energy moves the car from a to b. Same as yours. The energy can be measured. Petrol has a known amount of energy too. Energy measured in kw. So a direct comparison is easy. I get 196 per "gallon".

So if you were to adapt your driving style to use mostly the EV side, you might approach 300 to the 'gallon'. I am only suggesting that '196mpg' gives a false impression of the amount of energy your car uses. As I said, propelling it for a given distance calls for a predictable amount of energy to overcome various resistances, Petrol engines convert chemical energy at a known efficiency. Moving your car electrically doesn't somehow get extra power from thin air !

And if the car is a pure EV it means very little !

Edited by Andrew-T on 01/09/2023 at 12:25

Economy run - skidpan

When we use the Superb iV locally it predominately on the battery which we charge on the Octopus Go tariff at 9.5 pence a unit. Best combined mpg we have seen (which includes cost of electric converted to gallons at the current price and petrol used) is 133.47 mpg. That was late summer but we have seen a combined figure of 113.97 mpg in mid winter when the electric range is not as good.

When we go to the lodge in Scotland and do about 1000 to 1200 miles in the week pretty much on petrol (no opportunities to charge - the only electric is a full battery when we leave home plus whatever the car recovers) the combined for the week is around 58 mpg, pretty good when the previous less powerful 1.4 TSi 150 Superb manual would average about 52 mpg for the week, and the 1.4 TSi 140 Leon manual we had about 50 mpg for the week.

Economy run - Terry W

You need to be clear whether efficiency is measured in £££ or energy usage.

£££ is somewhat flawed and difficult.

  • liquid fuels are easy - fuel prices are a known fairly stable cost.
  • electricity is highly variable from zero (eg: PV on roof through night time rates to high cost fast chargers on motorways.

Energy is different. The typical ICE is ~30% efficient at turning the calorific value of the fuel into progress - the rest is lost in heat and friction.

An EV is ~90% efficient in using the power stored in the battery. Generating the electricity may consume zero fuel (eg: wind turbines) or be powered by gas which is ~50% efficient.

What is certain is that EVs have the potential to be net zero consumers of fuel (assuming 100%) green generation. ICE is unlikely ever to be net zero - unless bio fuels are developed, farmed, harvested and refined using green energy.

All the above deliberately ignores the investment and infrastructure cost and impacts associated with both options.

Economy run - skidpan

I don't overcomplicate it, just keep it simple.

I know exacty how much electricity I put in during a charge by looking at my 1/2 hour usage info on the Octopus website. From that using 9.5 p per kwh I can simply work out how much its cost me. At present a full charge that covers about 35 miles is £1.14 pence.

Locally at Tesco petrol was £1.489 this morning, £6.77 a gallon.

Thus a full charge is the equivalent of 0.168 gallons.

35 miles on 0.168 gallons is 208 mpg.

Simple and no extensive knowledge of energy required.

All I need to know is how much I am spending and how many miles I do.

Just like we have done for years with petrol.

Economy run - John F

This economy oneupmanship is all very well and I do appreciate the occasional satisfaction of extracting the most miles per gallon possible, but it could be argued that driving pleasure in general and car enjoyment in particular is inversely proportional to mpg.

Economy run - skidpan

This economy oneupmanship is all very well and I do appreciate the occasional satisfaction of extracting the most miles per gallon possible, but it could be argued that driving pleasure in general and car enjoyment in particular is inversely proportional to mpg.

Know what you mean but personally I don't drive in a manner to extract the last bit of mpg. I still drive in what I would describe as a "press on" but safe way, have to exceed the speed limit to overtake cars doing under the limit but on the whole stay legal.

Problem these days is many drivers object to being overtaken and close the gap in front of them to prevent the overtaking car getting in.

Economy run - Andrew-T

Simple and no extensive knowledge of energy required.

All I need to know is how much I am spending and how many miles I do. Just like we have done for years with petrol.

Yes, but you are really calculating mp£ (from what you spend) and converting that into mpg on the basis of petrol prices. Takes no account of how your electricity was generated - which you can only guess at !

Economy run - Ethan Edwards

OK so you'll be investigating how your petrol is produced too? Seems only reasonable since your holding Electricity to that standard. Could it be though you are simply searching for reasons to justify a course of action, that you have aready decided on?

Let's say the Electricity is generated by Solar PV. Are you then going to demand to know how the panels are made? The names of the installers? What they had for lunch the day they were installed? The makes of the wrist***ches they were wearing at the time.

Sounds very reasonable...

Economy run - skidpan

OK so you'll be investigating how your petrol is produced too? Seems only reasonable since your holding Electricity to that standard. Could it be though you are simply searching for reasons to justify a course of action, that you have aready decided on?

Let's say the Electricity is generated by Solar PV. Are you then going to demand to know how the panels are made? The names of the installers? What they had for lunch the day they were installed? The makes of the wrist***ches they were wearing at the time.

Sounds very reasonable...

Well said.

Yes, but you are really calculating mp£ (from what you spend) and converting that into mpg on the basis of petrol prices. Takes no account of how your electricity was generated - which you can only guess at !

So you are not happy with MPG or MP£, how about £'s per trip? That in reality seems odd since your original post is about what wonderful MPG's your Peugeot does.

Went to Tesco yesterday morning, about 12 miles.

Set off with 36 miles of charge and when we got back home we had 24 miles left. That is pretty normal. So since a full charge costs about £1.14 and we used 12/36 of the battery we used £0.38 of electric.

With the previous ICE Superb we would do about 40 mpg on that trip so 12 miles would be 0.3 gallons. With petrol at Tesco costing £1.489 a litre (£6.77 a gallon) the same 12 miles would cost us £2.03.

I have no idea how the petrol is produced or where the crude that its refined from originates. All I know about the electricity is I get it in a cable.

What I do know is the cost to go to Tesco on electric is way less than using petrol.

We are off to Scotland in a couple of weeks, about 430 miles door to door. In the ICE Superb at todays prices and 52 mpg the trip would have cost us £55.97 in fuel. In the PHEV setting off with a full battery and petrol doing about 58 mpg the trip will cost us about £51.32.

In reality all that proves (as we all know) PHEV's are of greater benefit in town.

Edited by skidpan on 02/09/2023 at 13:23

Economy run - mcb100
A couple of questions about the Superb PHEV - is there any improvement on a long journey by using inbuilt navigation (assuming it has it?)? Stellantis PHEV’s will make better use of the battery if they know what the destination is - ie you’ve programmed the navigation.
Which cables do you have - just a 3 pin to Type 2, or a Type 2 to Type 2?
Economy run - skidpan
A couple of questions about the Superb PHEV - is there any improvement on a long journey by using inbuilt navigation (assuming it has it?)? Stellantis PHEV’s will make better use of the battery if they know what the destination is - ie you’ve programmed the navigation. Which cables do you have - just a 3 pin to Type 2, or a Type 2 to Type 2?

Rarely use the Sat Nav (never have done in any car, prefer to get Waze out when needed). I know where I am going and I am quite capable of planning a route.

It has the granny cable (3 pin to Type 2) and Type 2 to type 2.

Economy run - mcb100
Not for a moment doubting your route planning capabilities, just wondering if economy would be better if it was used. A genuine question as I don’t know.
I, too, know where I’m going 99% of the time, but Google Maps/Waze knows where the traffic is.
Economy run - Andrew-T

<< So you are not happy with MPG or MP£, how about £'s per trip? That in reality seems odd since your original post is about what wonderful MPG's your Peugeot does. >>

The title 'economy run' is about economy of fuel, not saving ££. That is why I state mpg, not mp£. Any mp£ would fluctuate pretty wildly, especially these days !

By all means use £ per trip, but the trip would have to be a standard one.

Economy run - Andrew-T

Could it be though you are simply searching for reasons to justify a course of action, that you have already decided on?

No - what do you think that might be ? And why ?

I am only querying the scientific reasoning in quoting a consumption in mpg, when 'gallons or litres' of actual fuel may have contributed very little to the journeys being touted. I may reasonably assume that the cost of producing any petrol I use has been included in the pump price, plus quite a bit of tax. 'Fuelling' a car by plugging it into the mains is relatively imponderable, I suggest.

Economy run - skidpan

'Fuelling' a car by plugging it into the mains is relatively imponderable, I suggest.

No its not. have you not read my post above? I get the kw used to charge the car from the 1/2 readings on the web app.

It a modern version of "reading the meter".

Economy run - Ethan Edwards

'Fuelling' a car by plugging it into the mains is relatively imponderable, I suggest.

No its not. have you not read my post above? I get the kw used to charge the car from the 1/2 readings on the web app.

It a modern version of "reading the meter".

Agreed the energy consumed is easily determined. In my example the car actually tells you you've done 4.9m per kwh that equates to 204 watts per mile. Which if I say so myself is flippin awesome. Its a matter of simple maths to get the equivalent amount of petrol, as petrol has,a known amount of energy per gallon.

Oh and Andrew..Canadian Gold, his name was Gary , it was a Monday and iirc Timex but didn't get the model number. ;)

Economy run - Terry W

The financial efficiency measure one is relatively easy - save for two major variables which upset the calculation and will change the conclusion over time:

  • taxation and duty - very high on fossil fuels, very low on electricity
  • where the EV is charged - free at employer, from PVs, cheap night time rates, normal domestic rates, premium cost public chargers.

Energy efficiency - as a measure of energy put into the car vs output, EV is about 3 times as efficient - EVs turn ~90% of energy stored into usable motion, ICE ~30% with rest lost as heat and friction.

This is fairly meaningless as overall efficiency depends on how the electricity to charge the batteries is generated - solar, wind, nuclear, gas, coal etc.

Mixing the calculation to convert EV efficiency to mpg is nonsense. You may just as well work out the equivalent mpg based on the cost of shoes and walking, or cycling and the cost of bike helmets????????

A different perspective - the energy used to drive a car is mainly a function of its aerodynamics, weight and driving style. As EVs currently weigh 10-20% more than similar size ICE they are probably less efficient (need more usable energy).

As a user you have a choice whether to optimise cost, environmental impact, energy efficiency - or some balance of all three. There is no right answer.

Economy run - Andrew-T

Now for the other car : Pug 205 GR 1991, 1.4 petrol with manual choke, 78K miles. Owned since last Christmas, done 900 miles since, mostly 40-mile runs on A roads, some m'way, some Welsh back lanes, very little urban. Calculated 55 ± 2 mpg, confirmed graphically. Handbook claims 61 mpg at steady 90kph (= 56mph). Oil consumption hardly noticeable.

Not bad for an old un.

Economy run - badbusdriver

Now for the other car : Pug 205 GR 1991, 1.4 petrol with manual choke, 78K miles. Owned since last Christmas, done 900 miles since, mostly 40-mile runs on A roads, some m'way, some Welsh back lanes, very little urban. Calculated 55 ± 2 mpg, confirmed graphically. Handbook claims 61 mpg at steady 90kph (= 56mph). Oil consumption hardly noticeable.

Not bad for an old un.

Circa 1997 and working at a hotel in the Lake District, I had to make a visit home to Aberdeenshire. I had barely any money at the time (and didn't want to ask for a handout) so I kept my 1987 Renault 11 TSE (1.7 petrol, carb fed) to 55-60 mph on route, and worked out afterwards that I'd got 52mpg over the course of that 500ish mile trip.

I didn't think that was too shabby?

Economy run - Oli rag

Sometimes EV drivers when discussing the efficiency of their cars with others, are told by sceptics that their batteries may have been charged by a coal fired power station.

While this is possible but decreasingly unlikely given the move to more renewable energy sources, people sometimes forget the hidden extraction / processing energy cost of oil rigs, shipping and catalytic crackers used in petrol / diesel production.

Edited by Oli rag on 10/09/2023 at 17:05

Economy run - Andrew-T

.... people sometimes forget the hidden extraction / processing energy cost of oil rigs, shipping and catalytic crackers used in petrol / diesel production.

It may be 'hidden', but it has been paid for at the pump, or the oil companies wouldn't do it. Some EVs are charged on a special tariff subsidised by more expensive tariffs, which I suggest is a lot more hidden - and the electricity used may have come from a mixture of sources, so its real cost can only be guessed at.

From power source to EV, of course, efficiency is pretty high. Before that, we can't be sure.

Economy run - _

At the risk of being an outlier (yet again)

If we get approaching 40mpg on a long not too fast paced run, Happy.

The Stupid cost to change for something with that comfy seating position would take many years to mitigate. I'm tempting fate, but not tempted to change.

Apart from the one early glitch with a coil pack, there have been no problems.

Economy run - alan1302

At the risk of being an outlier (yet again)

If we get approaching 40mpg on a long not too fast paced run, Happy.

The Stupid cost to change for something with that comfy seating position would take many years to mitigate. I'm tempting fate, but not tempted to change.

Apart from the one early glitch with a coil pack, there have been no problems.

Glad I don't get 40MPG in our car - it would cost a fortune as we do approx 20,000 miles a year but thankfully get nearer 65MPG

Economy run - martin.mc

Just spotted this thread. Way back in the late 80s, our neighbour, a lorry driver, swore that he got 70mpg from his Ford Escort diesel (1.6 non turbo) on a long run. I believe him.