Anything from the Nissan stable appeal? Unless my memory's failing I think you've referred to a Nissan before.
We have had 4 Nissans, a Bluebird (dreadful but reliable). 2 Micra 1.2's (excellent) and a Note (bit slow but great space and comfort). When we swapped the Note we looked at then new model Micra but it failed meet any requirements for performance and space, bought the Fabia. Other than the Micra its only the Puke and Qashqai (ignoring the Leaf) and no interest in either of those.
I have an Ibiza and the handbrake on that is also closer to the passenger seat, than the drivers.
I recall that you generally always liked the VAG cars that you’ve had previously. Think I’m correct in saying that the Corolla you were originally considering is a similar size to a Golf. The 18 plate (previous gen) Golf of my dad’s has an EPG. On Carfile the Corolla and the Golf are a similar price.
Have you considered a Golf 1.5 eTSI 150 DSG?
Irrespective of what you eventually go for, I’m quite interested in the outcome.
We have also come to the same conclusion that the eTSi Golf looks interesting. In truth the Golf is about £1000 less than the Corolla 1.8 at Carfile but odd as it may seem its as well equipped as the Corolla in Life (base) spec. Going to have a look tomorrow.
Will update then.
|
We have also come to the same conclusion that the eTSi Golf looks interesting. In truth the Golf is about £1000 less than the Corolla 1.8 at Carfile but odd as it may seem its as well equipped as the Corolla in Life (base) spec.
If I was changing car tomorrow, the car I would be looking at (for me!) would be the Polo 1.0 TSi also in Life trim. The Life trim seems to have everything I would want.
Going to have a look tomorrow.
Hope all goes well tomorrow.
Will update then.
Look forward to the update.
|
Although I have always thought that 0-60 times were fairly academic it is interesting to note that in reviews, the published 0-60 times of pure IC engined cars are quite difficult to achieve in real life and are rarely bettered. On the other hand, EV and Hybrid times are in many cases bettered or matched at worst. Some recent examples I have seen were the MG4 standard range (published 7.7s vs road test 7.0s), the Honda Civic Hybrid (7.9s vs 6.7s) and the Corrola 2.0 hybrid (7.4s vs 7.4s). Ultimately, I don't think any of this is a surprise given the way EV's/ hybrids deliver their power.
Edited by davecooper on 17/08/2023 at 22:16
|
Although I have always thought that 0-60 times were fairly academic it is interesting to note that in reviews, the published 0-60 times of pure IC engined cars are quite difficult to achieve in real life and are rarely bettered. On the other hand, EV and Hybrid times are in many cases bettered or matched at worst. Some recent examples I have seen were the MG4 standard range (published 7.7s vs road test 7.0s), the Honda Civic Hybrid (7.9s vs 6.7s) and the Corrola 2.0 hybrid (7.4s vs 7.4s). Ultimately, I don't think any of this is a surprise given the way EV's/ hybrids deliver their power.
One other thing to bear in mind is the difference between a 'standard' self-charging hybrid and a PHEV in usage terms, not that the latter can be charged up, but that the former's range solely on battery power or supplementing the engine is extremely limited due to the size of the battery pack.
Some professional testers found that whilst the boost (say for a 0-60 start or overtaking) was impressive for the standard hybrid, once that charge had gone, the car was effectively just carrying dead weight around until the regenerative brakes recharged the hybrid battery, meaning those 0-60 times would be nowhere near the claimed ones, and probably less than a car with the same sized 'ordinary' ICE-only engine, which would be 'tuned' more for performance than the hybrid.
I suppose how often that scenario came about depends upon how heavy your right foot is...
It's what cooled my enthusiam for the Corolla 2.0 hybrid over the 1.8 version, which is the only one available in saloon format.
|
I suppose how often that scenario came about depends upon how heavy your right foot is...
So what's new, applies to every car (ICE, Hybrid and EV), thrash it and you use more fuel.
It's what cooled my enthusiam for the Corolla 2.0 hybrid over the 1.8 version, which is the only one available in saloon format.
Have you not noticed, Toyota withdrew the Corolla saloon form sale in the UK because virtually no one bought one, same as the Camry.
|
Which is a shame, saloons are more refined than hatchbacks and the Camry is a seriously well built car.
|
|
I suppose how often that scenario came about depends upon how heavy your right foot is...
So what's new, applies to every car (ICE, Hybrid and EV), thrash it and you use more fuel.
My point was that a pure ICE doesn't lose performance (quicte the oppsite) when you have a heavy right foot. The standard hybrid runs out of electrical power within a very short distance, which means in the case of the Corolla 2L, about 30-40PS, but with the added (now dead) weight of the battery pack. I would guess that the 0-60 time would then be in the region of +2 sec, hardly 'swift' for a car now costing around £30k.
It's what cooled my enthusiam for the Corolla 2.0 hybrid over the 1.8 version, which is the only one available in saloon format.
Have you not noticed, Toyota withdrew the Corolla saloon form sale in the UK because virtually no one bought one, same as the Camry.
They didn't exactly market that version, did they? Audi seem perfectly happy to keep selling the A3 saloon and BMW their small saloons. As on another thread, Toyota's problem is like many manufacturers in that they sell cars that mostly take sales away from themelves. I think there are more than enough hatchbacks and especially SUVs / crossovers these days to choose from.
They lost my business, and perhaps a good few others who like saloons but don't want the overly firm ride and dual clutch gearboxes (no option otherwise) of the German marques thesedays.
|
|
|
One other thing to bear in mind is the difference between a 'standard' self-charging hybrid and a PHEV in usage terms, not that the latter can be charged up, but that the former's range solely on battery power or supplementing the engine is extremely limited due to the size of the battery pack.
Some professional testers found that whilst the boost (say for a 0-60 start or overtaking) was impressive for the standard hybrid, once that charge had gone, the car was effectively just carrying dead weight around until the regenerative brakes recharged the hybrid battery, meaning those 0-60 times would be nowhere near the claimed ones, and probably less than a car with the same sized 'ordinary' ICE-only engine, which would be 'tuned' more for performance than the hybrid.
I suppose how often that scenario came about depends upon how heavy your right foot is...
It's what cooled my enthusiam for the Corolla 2.0 hybrid over the 1.8 version, which is the only one available in saloon format.
That is not how at least Toyota's hybrid system works - if you have fully depleted the drive battery (which I don't think the system will actually let you do) then it will charge from the ICE's output as well as any regen from braking.
|
skidpan have you used the site's car chooser tool www.honestjohn.co.uk/chooser/?t=119616
It's just possible it may identify something that you've not thought of. Not sure how up to date it is but might be worth a go.
|
skidpan have you used the site's car chooser tool www.honestjohn.co.uk/chooser/?t=119616
It's just possible it may identify something that you've not thought of. Not sure how up to date it is but might be worth a go.
Gave it a go, what harm can it do.
Selected petrol, hybrid, new, up to £28,000.
No 1 result was Golf.
So it looks like it thinks like us.
But then I looked at results 2, 3 and 4 which were Prius, Mondeo and Lexus CT, all cars that have been obsolete for sometime.
So does that mean that the Golf is the only new option that meets our selections or the site is total tat.
|
skidpan have you used the site's car chooser tool www.honestjohn.co.uk/chooser/?t=119616
It's just possible it may identify something that you've not thought of. Not sure how up to date it is but might be worth a go.
Gave it a go, what harm can it do.
Selected petrol, hybrid, new, up to £28,000.
No 1 result was Golf.
So it looks like it thinks like us.
But then I looked at results 2, 3 and 4 which were Prius, Mondeo and Lexus CT, all cars that have been obsolete for sometime.
So does that mean that the Golf is the only new option that meets our selections or the site is total tat.
I've only ever got weird answers on that.
Having just done the same thing (sort of) on Autotrader, the stand out that I don't think anyone has mentioned is the Honda Jazz. Definitely has an electronic parking brake.
|
So went to VW yesterday. Salesman listened and said that a 1.5 eTSi Style was all he could show us and he got the keys. Very nice plenty of space up front and in the rear and the boot was a very decent size even with a space saver in there. Only glitch was the side bolsters on the seat bases, wife found them a bit high and unforgiving, a problem she has had in the past which leads to hip pain.
Back into the showroom and he went to see his boss who pointed out that they had a eTSi Life in another compound which he brought over. Problem solved, seats less sport and wife fine with them.
Have arranged a test drive for Tuesday morning, its in the Style since the Life is only a 1litre eTSi but the Mrs has only got to get in and out a couple of times.
I don't think anyone has mentioned is the Honda Jazz.
We had already thought about it but when we went to see it we were instantly disappointed. Same class of car our Nissan Note was and that was spacious inside with a huge boot. The Jazz was spacious enough inside but the boot was tiny with no space for any type of spare. As others have said Honda have definitely lost the plot.
|
My point was that a pure ICE doesn't lose performance (quicte the oppsite) when you have a heavy right foot. The standard hybrid runs out of electrical power within a very short distance, which means in the case of the Corolla 2L, about 30-40PS, but with the added (now dead) weight of the battery pack. I would guess that the 0-60 time would then be in the region of +2 sec, hardly 'swift' for a car now costing around £30k.
It doesn't work like that since the hybrid battery never goes totally down to zero.
Take our Superb PHEV. The Hybrid system adds about 70 bhp to the normal TSi ICE output and with the car in "boost" mode (ICE and electric producing max output) it really flies. But even when the battery is on zero miles one press of the boost button (only needed when doing some serious overtaking) and the car performs exactly the same.
When we go to Scotland we set off with a full battery but after about 350 miles we are down to zero miles remaining. Since we have no opportunity to charge its working as a conventional hybrid for the next 650 miles (or more depending how much local running we do). Press the boost button at any time in those 650 miles and you would not notice any difference to having a full battery.
You need to read more true facts instead and then drive one for a while (we have had the Superb for almost 3 years) before you jump to another incorrect conclusion.
[Slight edit made. EA may be wrong on the PHEV issue but he's trying to be helpful contributing to your thread - Mod]
Edited by Xileno on 20/08/2023 at 07:35
|
Went for test drive Tuesday as arranged. Did not start too well, salesman met us as we arrived and then asked what car we we wanted to drive, why, surely he had notes following our visit the previous week when we made the appointment. Then he pointed to the car we would be driving, a car he had shown us the previous week, a 1.0 eTSi, not the 1.5 eTSi 150 we had asked to drive. So off he trotted and came back with a 1.5 eTSi 150 which he then had to go and fuel up. We came to the conclusion that they don’t bother doing anything until the customer turns up.
We had a rough idea of a route, about 30 miles, which he said would be fine. He then sent us on our way.
I drove to about ½ distance, some A roads, some in town but mostly rural B roads. It went really well, quiet, rode well (even on the large option wheels) and had a very good turn of speed when you clicked the selector to sport and gave it some right foot, very happy. Checked mpg on dash, showed 49 mpg which was about what I had expected.
Wife then took over. Her drive was about ½ on the M1 and ½ on urban and rural A roads. Car was going really great on the M1, very quiet (just a tiny bit of wind noise) and instant pick up to change lane. Then it started to go down hill. Sign flashing just after junction saying M1 ahead closed, we ground to a halt about 1½ miles from the junction. It took us about 1 hour 30 minutes to travel that distance, could have walked faster, who needs a car. But it gave us loads of time to look around the car and we spotted a few strange anomalies and the handbook in the glovebox had no answer. Main one was there is no temp or fuel gauge on the dash. Its supposed to be a user configurable TFT screen but the handbook gave no clues.
Once off the M1 it was still queuing traffic for the next 6 or so miles, took us another ½ hour or so.
Salesman was doing a handover when we got back so we simply left a message for him to get back to us and left to try and get home. Traffic was still queueing on our road mid evening and when we tried to get to the M1 yesterday morning we had to change to a different junction because it was still total gridlock. All because a tanker “exploded” (driver probably had a worse day than us). From leaving home to getting back it was probably about 4½ hours.
He did ring us and I asked for his best price and also asked how you would find the fuel and temp gauges. He said it had neither, you had to use the miles to go read out which as we all know reads total b******s even on a good day. Bit of googling suggests it has them, just needed to find the menu, more research (and hopefully a knowledgeable sales person) should provide the answer. He did e-mail me a price, simply copied the VW list one, not what I asked for.
So all told we are happy with the car and later today I plan to speak to Carfile to get a quote from them. Hopefully their dealer will have more info about the car itself, watch this space (again).
[Slight edit made. EA may be wrong on the PHEV issue but he's trying to be helpful contributing to your thread - Mod]
No idea what edit you made but since you don't own a Hybrid I doubt you know more than I do. And for the record EA is never helpful.
|
"And for the record EA is never helpful."
In this thread he has contributed helpfully and sensibly even if his knowledge on PHEV was wrong. But if you think differently then there's always the option to ignore.
|
And for the record EA is never helpful.
That is a totally unnecessary comment, which isn't true anyway. In my own experience, EA's comments and observations are very helpful.
Now when I started my own new car thread a few months ago, I asked for contributions from PHEV owners about a certain aspect of running one, even mentioned your name in brackets because I knew you had one.
Didn't get a response though.
|
And for the record EA is never helpful.
That is a totally unnecessary comment, which isn't true anyway. In my own experience, EA's comments and observations are very helpful.
So you think that EA's comments are "very helpful". Have you not spotted the long and pointless ramblings containing mostly unsubstantiated claptrap.
Now when I started my own new car thread a few months ago, I asked for contributions from PHEV owners about a certain aspect of running one, even mentioned your name in brackets because I knew you had one.
Didn't get a response though.
Don't normally bother. Commenting on anything other than saying how fab Toyota Hybrids are is pretty pointless.
|
And for the record EA is never helpful.
That is a totally unnecessary comment, which isn't true anyway. In my own experience, EA's comments and observations are very helpful.
So you think that EA's comments are "very helpful". Have you not spotted the long and pointless ramblings containing mostly unsubstantiated claptrap.
Now when I started my own new car thread a few months ago, I asked for contributions from PHEV owners about a certain aspect of running one, even mentioned your name in brackets because I knew you had one.
Didn't get a response though.
Don't normally bother. Commenting on anything other than saying how fab Toyota Hybrids are is pretty pointless.
I have to wonder why you post such threads, given you rarely seem to take other people's advice, unless it already conccurs with your own thoughts. Putting the boot in to people genuinely trying to add value to a non-contentious conversation will hardly encourage others to do so, will it.
Edited by Engineer Andy on 24/08/2023 at 15:28
|
I have to wonder why you post such threads, given you rarely seem to take other people's advice, unless it already conccurs with your own thoughts. Putting the boot in to people genuinely trying to add value to a non-contentious conversation will hardly encourage others to do so, will it.
If you care to read my first post I never asked for advice, I was posting our thoughts on a new car and our experiences so far.
I do exactly what I did pre internet forums, read articles, look at the specs and visit dealers. Its worked for us for many years.
Only difference these days is I mostly buy via a brokers since most dealers are pretty obnoxious and don't have a clue.
|
My point was that a pure ICE doesn't lose performance (quicte the oppsite) when you have a heavy right foot. The standard hybrid runs out of electrical power within a very short distance, which means in the case of the Corolla 2L, about 30-40PS, but with the added (now dead) weight of the battery pack. I would guess that the 0-60 time would then be in the region of +2 sec, hardly 'swift' for a car now costing around £30k.
It doesn't work like that since the hybrid battery never goes totally down to zero.
Take our Superb PHEV. The Hybrid system adds about 70 bhp to the normal TSi ICE output and with the car in "boost" mode (ICE and electric producing max output) it really flies. But even when the battery is on zero miles one press of the boost button (only needed when doing some serious overtaking) and the car performs exactly the same.
When we go to Scotland we set off with a full battery but after about 350 miles we are down to zero miles remaining. Since we have no opportunity to charge its working as a conventional hybrid for the next 650 miles (or more depending how much local running we do). Press the boost button at any time in those 650 miles and you would not notice any difference to having a full battery.
You need to read more true facts instead and then drive one for a while (we have had the Superb for almost 3 years) before you jump to another incorrect conclusion.
[Slight edit made. EA may be wrong on the PHEV issue but he's trying to be helpful contributing to your thread - Mod]
Skidpan, I was going by YouTube review videos that stated this, nothing more. Besides, what exactly does happen when the PHEV battery gets to the low point (not necessarily zero)? It must have a cut off if you use full throttle a lot, e.g. for overtakes, but without any braking to offset that energy used?
I presumed it meant that it cuts off the electric motor element of the car, meaning - as essentially I stated - that the car has Xbhp less power than without it and lugging dead weight of the batteries and EV motors, which means less performance for overtaking, etc and presumably reducing the 0-60 time until the regenerative braking element recharges it up enough to be re-used for X amount of time.
|
Now when I started my own new car thread a few months ago, I asked for contributions from PHEV owners about a certain aspect of running one, even mentioned your name in brackets because I knew you had one.
Didn't get a response though.
Don't normally bother. Commenting on anything other than saying how fab Toyota Hybrids are is pretty pointless.
Well there you go then!. If you choose not to bother being helpful to others (when you could in my case), its a bit rich making negative comments about the helpfulness of other forum members.
|
Skidpan, I was going by YouTube review videos that stated this, nothing more.
YouTube is no substitute for experience. I have in the 3 years we have owned the car yet to experience the car reverting to purely ICE power delivery even with 0 miles on the dash. There is still a reserve of battery left for times when you need the boot (in our case overtakes). Imagine the panic if when you floored it the car suddenly had 70 PS less than you expected mid overtake.
Not seen a figure for the Superb but in the case of Toyota Hybrids its a known fact that the battery is not allowed to go below 30% charge. With a bigger battery the Superb will be allowed to go below this.
In May this year we drove about 650 miles in Scotland and the return trip with 0 miles on the dash. It drove just like a normal hybrid using the battery when appropriate and there was always power when needed.
Drive one, you will love it.
|
My point was that a pure ICE doesn't lose performance (quicte the oppsite) when you have a heavy right foot. The standard hybrid runs out of electrical power within a very short distance, which means in the case of the Corolla 2L, about 30-40PS, but with the added (now dead) weight of the battery pack. I would guess that the 0-60 time would then be in the region of +2 sec, hardly 'swift' for a car now costing around £30k.
It doesn't work like that since the hybrid battery never goes totally down to zero.
Take our Superb PHEV. The Hybrid system adds about 70 bhp to the normal TSi ICE output and with the car in "boost" mode (ICE and electric producing max output) it really flies. But even when the battery is on zero miles one press of the boost button (only needed when doing some serious overtaking) and the car performs exactly the same.
When we go to Scotland we set off with a full battery but after about 350 miles we are down to zero miles remaining. Since we have no opportunity to charge its working as a conventional hybrid for the next 650 miles (or more depending how much local running we do). Press the boost button at any time in those 650 miles and you would not notice any difference to having a full battery.
You need to read more true facts instead and then drive one for a while (we have had the Superb for almost 3 years) before you jump to another incorrect conclusion.
[Slight edit made. EA may be wrong on the PHEV issue but he's trying to be helpful contributing to your thread - Mod]
Skidpan, I was going by YouTube review videos that stated this, nothing more. Besides, what exactly does happen when the PHEV battery gets to the low point (not necessarily zero)? It must have a cut off if you use full throttle a lot, e.g. for overtakes, but without any braking to offset that energy used?
I presumed it meant that it cuts off the electric motor element of the car, meaning - as essentially I stated - that the car has Xbhp less power than without it and lugging dead weight of the batteries and EV motors, which means less performance for overtaking, etc and presumably reducing the 0-60 time until the regenerative braking element recharges it up enough to be re-used for X amount of time.
Note also that Skidpan was talking originally about looking at a non-PHEV (standard hybrid) Toyota Corolla, where its 'eletrci traction' battery has a very low capacity, literally a matter of a few (sedate) miles and mainly used for slow speed urban driving and to get off the mark, because it can easily regen via its braking system.
This surely would not be useful on a fast flowing road where a few decent overtakes will run that battery to its 'minimum threshold' for use, and thus its 'extra' power is not available unless and until you make sufficient braking manouvres to regenerate tha bettery sufficiently.
This is what the YT video (a review of the Corolla 2L in 2019) precisely talked of, not of a PHEV with a significantly higher capacity battery.
|
Note also that Skidpan was talking originally about looking at a non-PHEV (standard hybrid) Toyota Corolla, where its 'eletrci traction' battery has a very low capacity, literally a matter of a few (sedate) miles and mainly used for slow speed urban driving and to get off the mark, because it can easily regen via its braking system.
This surely would not be useful on a fast flowing road where a few decent overtakes will run that battery to its 'minimum threshold' for use, and thus its 'extra' power is not available unless and until you make sufficient braking manouvres to regenerate tha bettery sufficiently.
This is what the YT video (a review of the Corolla 2L in 2019) precisely talked of, not of a PHEV with a significantly higher capacity battery.
The Toyota hybrid system at least, if necessary, will run the ICE at a higher rate than required for pure drive to recharge the drive battery & does not rely purely on braking regeneration. The boost from the EV component is also limited in terms of max. speed it is available to - it is now available to ~75mph iirc in current production but it used to cut out a lot lower in earlier versions.
The hybrid system in a current production Corolla also differs quite a bit from that in a 2019 (hence why e.g. the 0-60 time has dropped significantly in the current 1.8 v older).
|
Note also that Skidpan was talking originally about looking at a non-PHEV (standard hybrid) Toyota Corolla, where its 'eletrci traction' battery has a very low capacity, literally a matter of a few (sedate) miles and mainly used for slow speed urban driving and to get off the mark, because it can easily regen via its braking system.
This surely would not be useful on a fast flowing road where a few decent overtakes will run that battery to its 'minimum threshold' for use, and thus its 'extra' power is not available unless and until you make sufficient braking manouvres to regenerate tha bettery sufficiently.
This is what the YT video (a review of the Corolla 2L in 2019) precisely talked of, not of a PHEV with a significantly higher capacity battery.
The Toyota hybrid system at least, if necessary, will run the ICE at a higher rate than required for pure drive to recharge the drive battery & does not rely purely on braking regeneration. The boost from the EV component is also limited in terms of max. speed it is available to - it is now available to ~75mph iirc in current production but it used to cut out a lot lower in earlier versions.
The hybrid system in a current production Corolla also differs quite a bit from that in a 2019 (hence why e.g. the 0-60 time has dropped significantly in the current 1.8 v older).
That may all be perfectly correct, but what does happen when the battery just gets depleted to kick in that self-recharge via the ICE and the driver wants to do a significant overtake, needing the full 180PS+ that it is rated for? It can't do both, and the 'EV' power is limited. I personally wouldn't want it to 'cut out' that performance boost mid overtake in order for it to 'automatically' start recharging the battery.
|
Afaik the system will never allow the battery to become fully depleted (& remember on the standard hybrid it is really quite a small capacity drive battery so doesn't take much to recharge). With the current production hybrid system afaik the EV component will be available at all legal public road speeds in the UK.
I am sure that Toyota will have built an algorithm that has a hierachy for priority. However, I also believe that it's something that, whilst theoretically possible, in practice the chances of it are vanishingly small & your typical driver will never experience it.
|
Afaik the system will never allow the battery to become fully depleted (& remember on the standard hybrid it is really quite a small capacity drive battery so doesn't take much to recharge). With the current production hybrid system afaik the EV component will be available at all legal public road speeds in the UK.
I am sure that Toyota will have built an algorithm that has a hierachy for priority. However, I also believe that it's something that, whilst theoretically possible, in practice the chances of it are vanishingly small & your typical driver will never experience it.
Sense at last. Well done for clearly stating the obvious.
|
|
|
|