That so few accidents are the result of mechanical failure demonstrates the effectiveness of the MoT regime in the UK. ... I am happy to have the car I rely upon examined properly once every 12 months.
John-F's point is that the annual inspection ritual may be 'over-prescriptive' in the sense that if it were made biennial the failure rate for mechanical reasons might be little different. I believe the French operate a biennial system (? Focussed) which could give an indication, but as the French attitude to car ownership is rather different from ours, valid conclusions might be difficult.
But I agree that annual inspections are worthwhile, probably effective (on the whole) and combine easily with annual servicing, as required - as well as providing work for testing stations :-) It is probably good that drivers can be picked up for missing an annual test - i.e. forgetting to maintain their vehicle.
If the system were made biennial, owners could easily choose to test more often, as an erstwhile work colleague of mine used to have his Renault-5 tested every 6 months :-(
Edited by Andrew-T on 29/03/2023 at 12:13
|