I only just got rid of a Seat Toledo with the more powerful 1.2tsi in it. You're right, it went pretty well.
To be honest, I should have kept it and have made a boo-boo. I thought I was keeping the Corsa, but have fallen out of love with my job at the same time as another has come along.
|
I was remembering you got on well with your TSI engined Toledo.
I had a 2012 Fiesta that I bitterly regret trading in too. We all make these mistakes. Hopefully the better job will make up for it.
Edited by FiestaOwner on 10/12/2022 at 21:59
|
Depending on how quick you want, the bog standard swift 1.2 we have just bought is immensely fun and has plenty of zip, moreover it feels very much like an old school fun hatch, very light, agile, nippy and cheeky. I absolutely love driving it around twisty b roads. It's also averaging a true 60mpg as well which is very satisfying!
|
Thinking about it; other than the lack of rear seats, is there a reason not to go for an MX5?
|
I've read on this forum that rust is a problem. Maybe only certain years are affected?
|
They do need careful checking underneath, yes they do rust. I had an 04 1.8 in 2009 and it was already significantly rusting on the rear chassis. But otherwise it was a lovely drive though not very economical, mid 30s mpg. Newer ones are probably better protected.
|
Looking on Autotrader, £8k seems to be enough to get into a 2013 1.8 or a year older for a 2.0 (up to 70k, no ins write offs).
Depends on what you want and what you are willing to put up with. I wouldn't imagine the hood of a 10 year old MX5 would be well insulated, so you might want, or need, a hard top. In which case you'd need somewhere to store that in the summer months. Boot is pretty small, so you'd need to pack carefully if using it for a long weekend away. Also a very low car, so if you are not as limber as you once were, getting out could quickly become tiresome!. As much as the thought of a car like that appeals, I know that personally I would rather have something with a taller seat height. Not sure my wife could manage to get out of an MX5 with hood up and my Dad with his knackered knees and lower back definitely couldn't!.
|
Looking on Autotrader, £8k seems to be enough to get into a 2013 1.8 or a year older for a 2.0 (up to 70k, no ins write offs).
Depends on what you want and what you are willing to put up with. I wouldn't imagine the hood of a 10 year old MX5 would be well insulated, so you might want, or need, a hard top. In which case you'd need somewhere to store that in the summer months. Boot is pretty small, so you'd need to pack carefully if using it for a long weekend away. Also a very low car, so if you are not as limber as you once were, getting out could quickly become tiresome!. As much as the thought of a car like that appeals, I know that personally I would rather have something with a taller seat height. Not sure my wife could manage to get out of an MX5 with hood up and my Dad with his knackered knees and lower back definitely couldn't!.
My best mate has one with the hard top, and hangs it above the car in his garage. To keep the rust away, garaging is a good idea, as his looks still in excellent condition, despite being used as a daily driver (commute) most of its life.
Despite me being a fan of Mazdas and the MX-5 (looks and handling/performance-wise), I don't like sitting in one (not his previous MGTF), as to me they just aren't that comfortable unless you aren't that tall, which is saying something as I'm only 5-10.
I'd much prefer a larger car for longer trips, including the extra boot space and being able to utilise the rear seats for passengers or extra storage space.
|
|
|
Depending on how quick you want, the bog standard swift 1.2 we have just bought is immensely fun and has plenty of zip, moreover it feels very much like an old school fun hatch, very light, agile, nippy and cheeky. I absolutely love driving it around twisty b roads. It's also averaging a true 60mpg as well which is very satisfying!
TBH, most small cars with that size of engine are very nice to drive on winding country roads. Even my bigger (and now not exactly new [16yo+]) Mazda3 is very enjoyable on such roads even with its 104PS 1.6L petrol engine.
The power-to-weight improvement and smaller size of the supermini is a great combo for smile-inducing driving, as long as you avoid the very low profile tyres and harsh suspension models. I even thought that a Suzuki Celerio 1L was quite nice around town when I had one as a courtesy car once.
The Swift Sport (previous version - better looker) in black with a dark red roof (Mini-style) is a nice little car indeed, especially when mated to the 1.6L petrol engine. I'm sure many of the 1L - 1.4L turbos would make a nice update. Plus better mpg than my car (40) by some way.
|
We have the Karoq for long runs and filling up with stuff. This car will probably go a maximum of 15 miles each way for most of its life and probably no more than 5 90% of the time. There are quite a few hills around here (we live at the foot of the Mendips) so anything without much poke struggles.
I'd have a Twizy if I didn't mind being wet and cold.
|
We have the Karoq for long runs and filling up with stuff. This car will probably go a maximum of 15 miles each way for most of its life and probably no more than 5 90% of the time. There are quite a few hills around here (we live at the foot of the Mendips) so anything without much poke struggles.
I'd have a Twizy if I didn't mind being wet and cold.
Go have a test drive in a swift ( any swift) think you'll be surprised, incedently I did have a 1 litre Baleno as a loan car when my swift went in for a service, loved it, the paddle change gearbox was a complete hoot and like all suzukis loved to rev.
|
Now then. You don't see many of these.
www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202210301209200?a...3
Noticed that before but didn't think it would be your cup of tea. As with all kei cars, it is restricted to 64bhp (also to a top speed of 140kmh), but if memory serves they will hit 60mph in around 8.5 seconds.
But if you like the Daihatsu, there is also this Suzuki Alto Works RSZ on Ebay,
353615709594
It is the same price but appears (click on the link to the dealer website for plenty hi res pics) much better presented and no holes in the dashboard!
|
Thanks! Have you seen the rest of the stuff they've got? Incredible.
|
Thanks! Have you seen the rest of the stuff they've got? Incredible.
Yes, I have. Discovered the place by chance a few months ago while looking at Mazda Bongo's on Ebay!.
But they certainly have some interesting stuff, I'm actually quite drawn to that old shape Vectra V6 estate!
|
So...having tried a few options, I have today placed a deposit on something that (I think) fits the bill. There is no prize for guessing, not least as it's not that hard, but it's rear wheel drive, turbocharged and has go-faster stripes.
'Rocket' is certainly overdoing it, but it's a lot more fun than the press would have you believe.
|
So...having tried a few options, I have today placed a deposit on something that (I think) fits the bill. There is no prize for guessing, not least as it's not that hard, but it's rear wheel drive, turbocharged and has go-faster stripes.
'Rocket' is certainly overdoing it, but it's a lot more fun than the press would have you believe.
Does it have an automated manual gearbox perchance?
|
It does.. ..NOT
I'm struggling then, any more clues?
|
You were very close with your first guess. Just longer and not as smart.
|
You were very close with your first guess. Just longer and not as smart.
Does it have a manual gearbox?, if so, is that unusual?
Does it have a folding metal hardtop?
|
Yes, it has a manual gearbox. No, it's not unusual. No, it has a perfectly normal roof.
Apart from the engine being in the back, it's almost entirely unremarkable and I'm almost embarrassed about wasting your time trying to work out what it is.
|
Engine in the back? Must be a Twingo.
|
Engine in the back? Must be a Twingo.
Give that man a medal. Yes, it's a Twingo. It popped up this morning at the village garage, so I went for a quick test drive, spun the wheels pulling off to the forecourt, chucked it around a couple of roundabouts and decided to have it. It's a little unrefined but good fun and ses.to have the power in the right place.
It's another that makes me very suspicious of reviews; they all say it's no fun, the steering's vague etc. We had a Seat Mii a while ago and the Twingo is a lot more entertaining.
|
I know you said not as smart, but...
www.honestjohn.co.uk/smart/roadster/ ?
EDIT: doh :)
Edited by maz64 on 17/01/2023 at 21:38
|
"I know you said not as smart, "
I took that as a play on words although being pedantic I suppose it should have a capital 's'...
|
It was, and also the fact that the Twingo is really just a Smart Forfour but less ugly.
|
Good for you! A genuinely interesting choice. I look forward to reading about how it works out for you.
I want it to be great actually. Let’s hope it proves to be at least tending towards a bit of that!
When my Mercedes was younger, I had it serviced by a main dealer and they used to come and collect it for that. The guy would often arrive in a Smart 4 four and leave it on my driveway for the day while he took my car in.
I never got the opportunity to drive one of those, but he used to say he enjoyed them anyway.
|
Yes, it has a manual gearbox. No, it's not unusual. No, it has a perfectly normal roof.
Apart from the engine being in the back, it's almost entirely unremarkable and I'm almost embarrassed about wasting your time trying to work out what it is.
Don't be embarrassed, while I didn't come up with the correct answer, it gave me something to think about!.
As you probably guessed my first thought was the Smart Roadster (though that was a bit of a red herring as I'd forgot that it didn't use a turbo). When you said I was very close, but it was longer and not as smart, I thought (bearing in mind your expressing an interest in the MX5) of a basic Mercdes SLK. Mercdes owned Smart (part own these days I think), so close in that respect. Definitely longer, the basic models use a 1.8 turbo and, with a manual box, I guess they might actually be quite fun. I'd also guess the motoring press might consider them no fun without a much more powerful engine!.
But the Twingo is something I've also been interested in. They are narrow, tall and have a very good turning circle. Despite a boot which, on paper, is small, they are very practical. Because the engine is under it, the boot floor is level with the bottom of the tailgate and the rear seats fold to make a completely flat load area. In addition, the front passenger seat back can also be folded so long items (as long as they are not too wide!) can be transported. What puts me off is the lack of a good auto option (though having discussed the possibility of going back to a manual car, she reckons she'd cope) and also the rear seats don't look very comfortable, even for the size of car. The rear seat cushions appear to be low, flat and short. I often take my folks out, so I'm not sure it would work for us.
TBH, I have not read that the steering is vague?. The minus points I have read are that the turbo suffers from more lag than you'd expect from a modern car, but familiarity would overcome that before long. Also stability in crosswinds due to being so tall, narrow and with little weight over the front wheels. And that the traction control (which can't be switched off) stifles any fun which might be gained from its mechanical layout. Apparently the front end also 'bobs' like an old 911!. Also, bear in mind there is no possibility for carrying a spare unless you get a roof rack!.
But I will look forward to hearing how you find it!.
|
|
|
|