When perennially under-appreciated 'slightly bigger Fiesta', the Fusion, came out, I remember reading about how much effort Ford had put into making it as user friendly as possibly for folk who were a bit less mobile. They had folk wearing suits designed to simulate restricted movement trying out various seat heights, door opening sizes and angles, positioning of controls, etc. Also, the boxier shape and taller seating position meant it was very easy to see out of and place on the road, a boon for less confident drivers (like my wife) as well as those with mobility issues. Sadly this did not translate into the sales success the Fusion deserved, and I say that from personal experience because we had one!.
But it makes me wonder if that kind of consideration and attention to detail is applied to current cars?. It is common to assume a higher seating position is better for the less mobile, even though that isn't necessarily the case. A little higher will usually help as long as the width of the sill doesn't impede too much, but a seat being more than a little higher could easily make things harder for anyone other than those taller than average. And with 'over styled' SUV's being the norm, the sill being of a width which causes problems for some is not going to be given much consideration next to the whims of the stylist, because as is the case with the majority of modern cars, image is everything!.
Access to an old SAAB 99 or 900 was possibly even better than our Fusion (despite not being very tall) due to the ingenious sill/door design. The bottom of the door curved down over the sill and in under the car. This had two advantages, first of which was the resulting very narrow sill making it so easy to get onto and off the seat. Second was that you were in no danger of getting dirt on to the bottom of your trousers/legs from the sill because when closed, the door completely enclosed it!.
|