Actually mine is the 2015 version. Bought it at 3 years old, fine for 2 years and nothing but a money pit ever since. Shame because the ride is actually ok. The RAV4 is one I had looked at but then read a few not so favourable reviews and they turned me off them a little. I will have a look at the specs on a CRV though for sure. I did also look into VW Tiguan and again turned myself off them based on some online reviews but may look at them again. Many thanks.
As your car was the previous shape 3008 it shares very little with the current one, or the Grandland. The gearbox is a torque converter auto rather than an automated manual which is more reliable and smoother, though possibly less efficient.
I wouldn't read to much into negative reviews of the RAV4, they are constantly amongst the most reliable cars in their class. Some of the diesel engines Toyota have used came from BMW and were not that great (not sure if they were used in the RAV4 though), but petrol and hybrid are absolutely fine, as are the auto gearboxes. The auto Tucson and Sportage will (I think) both use DCT (dual clutch automated manuals) gearboxes and while they may fare a little better than some, it is a type of gearbox* I'd try to avoid personally, especially so if buying used. As such, as an auto, I'd have the CX5, RAV4 and CRV at the top of my list for cars of that type. TBH, were it not for the possible question mark over the reliability of the 1.2 turbo (Puretech) petrol used in the Grandland, I'd be inclined to place that above the Korean's just because of the better (IMO) gearbox.
*The DSG gearbox used in VAG cars is the same type, as is the Powershift used in Fords. They can be reliable if driven sensibly, but I'd still be reluctant.
|