Some points that I seem to keep repeating, because they seem to keep coming up.
a) Relative to petrol,,which is quite dangerous. (That's why they make napalm from it) , but which yáll are used to, hydrogen is VERY safe
b) I grew up in the UK in the 50's and 60's when most homes had hydrogen as a domestic supply. Town gas was mostly hydrogen, with some carbon monoxide. It was made from coal and water.
I somehow survived.
c) The amount of (fresh) water involved was relatively small and supply limits were not a significant issue, nor would they be with electrolytic production.
Never said it wouldn't be unsafe (though I'm sure I wouldn't want to be anywhere near a hydrogen-fuelled vehcile if its (highly) pressurised tank gave way, especially at the scene of an accident.
Hydrogen tanks take up a significant amount of valuable space from the boot area.
Hydrogen reformed from natural gas is hardly environmentally-friendly - you may as well use natural gas directly as it then doesn't need to go through yet another process that uses up energy.
We already have a scarcity of fresh water (especially in summer), and having millions of cars (let along HGVs) using a lot more to create hydrogen would put yet more strain on the system.
As per comments on the fuel cell thread, electroytic production is an energy-hungry process, so either you use lots of grid electricty or you need vast swathes of PV panels just to create enough fuel for a few vehicles per day (see story from HJ about Toyota and the pallet lifeters at the factory).
Yes, this tech is changing, but I suspect we are 10-20 years away from it even becoming viable on a larger scale, plus the cost/time to implement it, including, as I think would be likely, the desalination systems for using seawater instead of fresh water and storage of the hydrogen (which needs lots of electricity and/or space, both which are in short supply.
The industry was making big noises 10-15 years ago about fuel cells tech, and we've barely moved on in that time. They do this often to big-up the chances of new tech being a success in order to get grant funding from governments, other agencies and investors, plus tax breaks.
I would be sceptical about it being viable at all commercially for all until nearer to 2040 or likely 2050, not because of the tech in the cars, but because of the infrastructure and economic implcations of going too soon to scale it up (as I fear governments and industry are doing for EVs), just to virtue-signal their fake green crendials to all and sundry.
To add some extra information, watch this video from Engineering Explained's Jason:
youtu.be/3IPR50-soNA
The last 5-6 minutes on 'green' hydrogen production are quite telling, especially given the source of the information he's quoting.
Edited by Engineer Andy on 17/06/2021 at 19:02
|