.
TBH they should be putting honking taxes on expensive new cars that are not fuel efficient or which emit a lot of CO2/other pollutants to encourage those same people to go EV (it's not as though they can't afford to) and to subsidise the building/enlarging of the charging network.
.
To be honest they already do. Such a car will pay many, many more thousands in tax over its lifetime than the equivalent EV.
And you are seeing the results with the larger/luxury market seemingly going EV before many others. This is shown up in used demand as well with something like a Tesla Model S holding its price vastly better than ICE equivalents.
Take a 7 year old Model S or a Jaguar XJ. Even if they cost about the same new the Tesla is worth £35k and the Jag about £10k if you're lucky.
To be fair though, many of the EVs have not yet reached the age where their battery packs either seriously drop off in performance (range) or come to the end of their life generally.
I wonder what they would be worth then - not much, I guess, given a wealthy person won't be buying a 10yo Tesla, but nor will someone on a modest income, as they cannot afford to replace the battery pack.
I'd be more interested to see how much eary mk1 Nissan Leafs now go for and how many are still around. I mean, why would anyone take the risk of having to spend several £0000s on a new battery pack (or at least a sizeable chunk thereof) for a car probably worth around that figure if the battery was working (never mind the range)?
Add to that Tesla apparantly will not look after cars over 10 years old (I read more than one article a while ago from the US about this) - presumably it's just as much about them not keeping stocks of/making new parts for older cars.
I realise ICE car manufacturers aren't obliged to either, but most still do (I can still get OEM parts for my Mazda3 and that went out of production in 2009), and, more importantly, there's a big market for pattern parts - not sure if there is yet for EVs.
|