It pays to buy the 'right' banger. Nothing French or italian. Not Ford or Vauxhall.
Buy Toyota, Honda or Suzuki. They are built for the long haul.
Petrol without turbo.
1-2 owners and decent service history.
|
It pays to buy the 'right' banger. Nothing French or italian. Not Ford or Vauxhall.
Buy Toyota, Honda or Suzuki. They are built for the long haul.
If we're talking real bangers, reliability stats become very approximate after 10 years. It all depends how those 10 years have passed. History and condition are more important.
If you automatically exclude French without further thought, you can easily ignore some good cars.
|
It pays to buy the 'right' banger. Nothing French or italian. Not Ford or Vauxhall.
Buy Toyota, Honda or Suzuki. They are built for the long haul.
If we're talking real bangers, reliability stats become very approximate after 10 years. It all depends how those 10 years have passed. History and condition are more important.
If you automatically exclude French without further thought, you can easily ignore some good cars.
Sorry I disagree. Buying a car that was properly designed and built in the first place is most important.
I have a relative who bought a new Renault some years back. That car was treated like a new born baby. Dealer serviced on the dot, carefully driven etc. He had so many problems - once out of warranty cost a fortune in repairs. Electrics, turbo, gearbox. Ditto my sister had a Fiat from new - so many problems. In fact I was driving it when the electric power steering packed up at four years old. Cost about £800 to fix that. Regular servicing and sympathetic ownership is of course also important - hence my comment about a low number of owners and service history. I spent a lot of my working life in troublespots around the world - see what they drive in those places - when the going gets tough you won't see Renaults an Fiats - think Toyota, Mitsubishi, Honda etc
|
You can run a car on a shoestring - but it helps if you (a) are able to properly assess condition before purchase, and (b) are able to do basic maintenance yourself. Even the most knowledgable get it wrong occasionally and end up with lemons.
If it is possible I would buy (outright or PCP) a new or nearly new basic city car. Plan to keep it for 5+ years and cost will be around £1000-1500 pa. This is a little more than repairs each year for MoT but (a) it should be far more reliable, and (b) non- MoT failures will be rare.
Reliability is likely to be far better than £1000 - 2000 banger. Costs for other repairs - many items degrade or fail with wear - eg: battery, brake discs, clutch, wiper motors, aircon etc etc.
|
Even the most knowledgable get it wrong occasionally and end up with lemons.
Yes I have to admit to buying a Lemon last year as I bought a Civic 1.8 2013, which had an oil burning problem (about a litre per 100 miles) I didn`t check the inside of the cam cover, the inside was thick mud like oil and first time I hadn`t checked this on a car
I should have also checked the tyres as they had been changed between looking at the car and when I went back to buy it, but being in a hurry to get a car I missed the bits that matter
anyway its gone now and replaced with 2008 1.4 Civic which surprised me as it had FSH but not looked after inside but cleaned up ok, and first MOT I gave it failed on n/s/r brake light first ever mot failure on it in 9 years runs like a new car so will keep it a few years, a bit underpowered but its better than I expected for economy and not a lot of difference to the 1.8 imo
It is really difficult to find a decent second hand car now, as plenty want to get rid of problem cars so be weary on all cars looked at
|
|
|
<< Sorry I disagree. Buying a car that was properly designed and built in the first place is most important. I have a relative who bought a new Renault some years back. That car was treated like a new born baby. Dealer serviced on the dot, carefully driven etc. He had so many problems - once out of warranty cost a fortune in repairs. Electrics, turbo, gearbox. Ditto my sister had a Fiat from new - >>
I don't dispute your account, but it doesn't prove French and Italian cars are rubbish, only that you have been unlucky. Every manufacturer makes 'Friday cars', some more than others. But not many 21st-century cars are 'bad' cars.
My experience could be said to disprove your prejudice (sorry, facts). I have owned my present Pug 207 since Christmas 2008. With regular simple servicing, it has needed only two sets of tyres and one of discs and pads. Just recently its original battery started to fail, and a door lock misbehaved. Nothing else. None of my (many) other Peugeots have been naughty either.
You shouldn't make categorical statistical statements based on a sample of two cars. And of course sometimes second-hand cars are being sold on for a reason ....
|
My experience could be said to disprove your prejudice (sorry, facts). I have owned my present Pug 207 since Christmas 2008. With regular simple servicing, it has needed only two sets of tyres and one of discs and pads. .... None of my (many) other Peugeots have been naughty either.
To dismiss 'French cars' is absurd. Even though the whole shebang is owned by Stellantis, Peugeot have always prided themselves as being a cut above their national competitors. When I was in Africa their 504 was a reliable favourite for the challenging roads. They have also done well at Le Mans, a race where the quality and reliability of the car is far more important than the skill of the driver. I see no reason why our Pug 2008 should not at least equal your 207 experience.
|
|
Reliability is more complex than the quality of the design, engineering and manufacture.
There are numerous car reliability surveys - Warranty Direct, JD Power, What Car, Auto Express etc. Some of these may be a rehash of data from the other surveys, but the results are inconsistent.
The survey may be skewed between private and company purchases. Private buyers may typically take far greater care of their asset than company car drivers who know that after a few years they simply give it back and get a new one.
Many used cars find their way on to the s/h market via car rental companies whose vehicles may be abused. Car rental companies want low priced vehicles which perform for 6-12 months before they end up at Motorpoint or similar.
There are also some clear anomalies - eg: Audi, VW, Seat, Skoda all come from the same family, use a lot of common components, but achieve very different outcomes in terms of reliability. Hyundai and Kia often achive very different scores.
|
Couldn’t be a better time to run a banger as now IMHO.
My work colleague bought a new Golf R just before the pandemic struck and has covered about 300 miles. Others have said the same that the car has sat on the drive for months.
Depreciation doesn’t stop for COVID so just to have a car to take you to the supermarket fulfils most people’s requirements.
|
My logic on giving up on a banger is simple.
Make a list of all known faults or issues.
Many will be once off fixes at a cost but a few will not be: eg rust tends to be endemic, engine issues (Oil burning - as above) may need a rebuild which will likely find a host of very expensive issues.
So if new brakes and a new exhaust (stolen Cat) will get the car running with a defined cost, it's probably worth while keeping.
But if the engine overheats or burns oil, and the tyres are worn and there are a long list of issues as MOT advisories , or the underneath is a mess of rust with welding required - then the costs of repair may be unknown and could run into £1000s..
Some cars resist abuse better than others. Some dislike infrequent oil changes (see Rover Head gaskets as an example). Just don't buy them.
Specifically: GM and LR have poor engineering built in: buying bangers from them is a recipe for disaster. (Renault in the 1990s were terrible when new! Now improved.)
Edited by madf on 12/03/2021 at 12:21
|
It always amuses me when in a discussion about reliability, there are always posts along the lines of
"My [country of origin/make/model,/vintage] has been utterly reliable. Apart from a new gearbox, aircon not working, and the occasional suspension issue, nothing has gone wrong, only the usual rust around the [insert description] which I have had welded up"
All cars are fixable, costs may vary. In the last few years many car and particularly "premium" models have been fitted with increasing complex mechanicals and technology which are both difficult to diagnose and eye wateringly expensive to repair or replace.
It helps enormously if you are savvy mechanically. I was brought up in era of terrible rust and reliability 1960-1980. To keep a new car going more than 3-4 yeats required all sorts of skills from bodywork to being able to strip cylinder heads. Many of my age acquired "mechanic" skills and there came a point where I felt I could assess a good motor when I saw one.
But now I am not sure.
Nowadays, expensive failures come out of the blue. Be it an electric window winder, DSG gearbox, or an engine that turns out to have a fundamental design weakness that trashes it while driving on the motorway.
Anyway, enough of my ramblings. To answer the OP's question on when to give up on a banger, I recall a reply to this oft discussed topic on this forum which struck a chord with me.
When you wouldn't want to go for a drive in it more than a few miles from home.
Edited by brum on 12/03/2021 at 12:58
|
I really like these threads and the varied views and experiences from people. As well as many of the good points raised, I think it's beneficial to delve deeper into specific models as there can be some hidden gems. For example, the old Rover 200/400 would not be on my list because of the reputation of the K series engine (HGF) but if you chose the correct model, there was a Honda engine, as in the Japanese re-imported 400 someone posted about recently.
|
I really like these threads and the varied views and experiences from people. As well as many of the good points raised, I think it's beneficial to delve deeper into specific models as there can be some hidden gems. For example, the old Rover 200/400 would not be on my list because of the reputation of the K series engine (HGF) but if you chose the correct model, there was a Honda engine, as in the Japanese re-imported 400 someone posted about recently.
Ford spent a lot of money to improve the headgasket on the K series engine during the short period they owned LR-unfortunately they then sold the company.
|
I think SAIC money might have solved the HG issue, if we can believe Wikipedia
“ UK engineering firm Ricardo plc were tasked with remedying the well known faults of the K series by SAIC Motor for its introduction into the Chinese marketplace. With a redesigned head, improved waterways, stiffened block as well as changing the manufacturing process and quality of material, the Kavachi is seen as the pinnacle of K-series development. As of 2015, with more than half a decade in the market, there have been no reported issues of head gasket failure on cars using the Kavachi engine.”
I actually thought they did a good job (cosmetically) on the chinese version of the Rover 75
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roewe_750
|
When the body starts rusting I will get rid of it. I buy cars that are lacking in extras with the sole intention of keeping the car and maintaining it for as long as possible. Some makes are full of modules that need main dealer computers to interrogate them jacking up the cost of ownership.
I would recommend buying a common basic car that is not direct injection and changing the oil frequently to stack the odds in your favour
|
Quite often, it would actually make more sense, and be vastly cheaper to fix and keep rather than scrap and replace.
But, a combination of fearing throwing good money after bad, and the understandable allure of a newer, hopefully better car, is a strong motivator.
Edited by Alby Back on 12/03/2021 at 15:04
|
I agree, infact with the exception of one car, every other change has been because I just fancied a change. Sometimes the next owner of my cars has got a good 'un!
|
|
|
Reliability is more complex than the quality of the design, engineering and manufacture.
Yes, true. But get design, engineering and manufacture right and you are 80% of the way there. A relative of mine used to work for JLR. He reckoned their cars were poor. He subsequently went to work for Toyota - he told me that Toyota warranty claims were FORTY TIMES lower than JLR. When another relative's Fiat electric power steering failed I contacted a EPAS repairer and as soon as I said 'Fiat' he accurately described the fault, 'they nearly all fail - bad design' - and he had replacements on the shelf.
You guys take your chances with French and Italian. I put my faith in Japanese.
|
<< You guys take your chances with French and Italian. I put my faith in Japanese. >>
More than happy to. As I said above, nearly 40 years experience of Pugs has given me no reason to take your view. After abandoning BL cars in the early 80s, SWMBO and I have also driven a Cavalier, a Nissan Prairie, a Fiat Punto and a Renault Clio. None of those gave us much trouble either.
As I also said, you were just unlucky. Or could there be another reason ? :-)
Do you really think all those people driving French cars are on tenterhooks, just waiting for them to break down?
Edited by Andrew-T on 13/03/2021 at 17:40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|