As an Octavia owner, I concur Skoda's are better value for money. But, when I sit in my friend's A4 of the same era, I can tell why they cost more. They're smoother, with less noise intrusion and feel nicer to drive. They are however, a tad smaller than the comparative VW or Skoda.
We have tested 4 Octavias over the years and been disappointed every time. We found the finish OK and the space great but the level of noise and overall refinement was terrible. 3 were 1.4's with the simple beam rear suspension but when we tried a 2.0 diesel with the independent rear end it was no different. We had a Seat Leon 1.4 TSi with the simple beam rear suspension and it was fine.
This is why we bought the Superb. Whilst its bigger than we really need the fit, finish, quality and refinement are on a different level. Before we bought the 2nd Superb we tried a Passat Estate and it was no better in any respect but it was slightly smaller and more expensive.
Regarding reliability and customer satisfaction, is this because the Skoda's are the entry level into the VW group and so, less loaded with tech. And, because customers know they are entry level, their expectations are adjusted accordingly?
I would give a 100% reliability and satisfaction to Skoda not because they are cheaper but because the 3 we have bought over the past 4 years have only needed to visit the garage for servicing and the tech they have is just fine.
When I am spending my hard earned pension I do not adjust my expectations. I have every right to same quality of service as the next man.
|