Hi
I've just joined the forum (have used the site for years) to get some advice on this, so any helpful responses are very welcome.
In July we bought a 2017 i30 from a dealer. We were told it had one owner. The first service wasn't in the book so I've been chasing it. Yesterday the dealer emailed me with confirmation of the first service. The confirmation was in the form of a letter from Europcar confirming the service, but also confirming that it had been a rental vehicle.
I know that views on buying ex-rental vehicles are mixed. "Hire cars are the fastest cars in the world" vs "they get serviced properly" and I'm not sure whether to be concerned or not.
There was a ruling a couple of years ago that dealers should tell a potential buyer if the car is ex-lease or ex-rental, and that it shouldn't be up to the prospective buyer to ask. The ASA have confirmed this in their guidance, and it's backed by legislation.
What do people think? I know that resale value is likely to be affected if the next buyer knows it was once a hire car. The car is very tidy and drives straight, and still has 2.5 years' warranty on it), but if it has been ragged by hirers there may be premature wear in the future (clutch etc) that's not covered by a warranty. If I'd been told at the time then it would have affected our decision to buy.
I am going to raise it with the dealer. I just don't know what I should expect. I know that in these situations then the advice is to propose a solution, but I have no idea what that would be. I'm not someone who uses every opportunity to bleed as much as they can out of an issue, but I don't think we should lose out on this, when we've already paid a price based on omitted information and we can't predict the future of the car.
Comments?
Edited by Mister Paul on 14/09/2020 at 17:09
|