Hi, looking for some legal opinion about liability. I have CCTV footage of a well know commercial hire van hitting my parked vehicle and driving off without stopping or leaving details. Unfortunately I don't have a number plate, a police report has been filed and insurance company informed. However as no-one is injured the insurance companies don't seem interested and say without a licence plate they can't accept a claim.
However it's my belief that I've proven the incident took place but am in no position to find the license plate. The rental van owner however will ultimately identify the damage to their property when the van is returned and reclaim their losses from the driver or the third party company who hired the van whereas I am left bearing the costs of the incident,
Am I correct in thinking there is a burden of proof now on the rental company to show that they are someone not liable for the damage regardless of the untraced license? And if they say the van is insured by a third party the burden of proof is to show that otherwise it must be assumed the van is insured with them and the driver has a rental agreement for costs (not an insurance policy)
It seems a convenient fact that the rental company will potentially profit from a criminal hit-and-run whilst watching the innocent party (me) bear the costs of this act.
I'm not a lawyer, but naturally feel aggrieved at the situation especially as my vehicle is brand new.
|