I read in todays paper, I won't say which one as it tends to set people off in another direction, that it can cost £100 more on the premium for driving an automatic car.
Albeit some may react badly it would be interesting to know which paper reported this. It's not exactly 'political' content is it?
I suspect the reason is that, across the whole UK car fleet, automatics are more likely to be involved in accidents. These will involve the well publicised 'wrong pedal' stuff and various other issues around creep, runaway and inadvertent mix ups of forward and reverse gears. Add into the blend too the older people who buy an automatic for convenience or because of health issues.
The vast majority of those accidents will be panel creasing or 'fender bender' encounters but a few will have far more dire consequences.
The secret I suspect is to shop around for the insurer who has that issue under control, for example by being selective about what they cover.
|