DAB has made my radio listening at work much more pleasurable, the roof aerial keeps the signal going in all but the most rural of locations.
I have 4 indy stations programmed in and swap between the 4 as and when propagands broadcasts and adverts are aired because at least 1 will still be playing music apart from probably the 8am news, and i'm usually otherwise engaged at that time, win win
Avoid the state broadcaster completely, my two traffic warning systems mean i don't need 'traffic' on the radio so the SB doesn't even raise its horned head there, bliss.
EPB won't ever be fitted to a car i own, and unless someone (hopefully not me) writes my present lorry off by the time it comes up for replacement i'll be retired.
|
Really Stevie B?
DAB is far superior. I can listen to far more stations including Radio 5 live and not in FM.
Far more choice including Radio X.
I do miss a CD player tho.
Maybe you prefer a manual choke and those push to squirt windscreen washers.
Oh and while we at it, no dip rear view mirror, no head restraints, no passenger mirror, no abs etc.
The good ole days are week and truly gone - thank goodness.
|
My current car which I have had for six months has electric or electronic parking brake.
I get on O.K.with it, just about, but the problem I find is that it’s either off or fully and firmly on with nothing inbetween. Pulling the lever switch to the on position brings the car to a jerking sudden full stop if the car is gently still moving forwards. I view the electric park brake as a solution to a problem that did not exist. It may be beneficial to drivers who cannot master a hill start using a traditional handbrake.
Now a question for the forumites that may know the answer. Car with electric park brake is left standing / parked up for a few weeks and the battery goes completely flat. Does the park brake then release itself without any power to keep it on or does it default to being ‘locked’ on ? I have not suffered a flat battery ( yet ) but I’d be interested to know what might be the outcome in such circumstances.
BTW I also miss not having a CD player.
r
|
Now a question for the forumites that may know the answer. Car with electric park brake is left standing / parked up for a few weeks and the battery goes completely flat. Does the park brake then release itself without any power to keep it on or does it default to being ‘locked’ on ? I have not suffered a flat battery ( yet ) but I’d be interested to know what might be the outcome in such circumstances.
Afaik it should be locked on (at least until you have power to the system again when you should be able to release it).
As for DAB, it's well known that at least in the UK the sound quality is often inferior to FM as stations often run at low bit-rates (& some even broadcast in mono in this day & age!) but it has greatly expanded the wider availability of minority stations.
|
|
|
Avoid the state broadcaster completely, my two traffic warning systems mean i don't need 'traffic' on the radio so the SB doesn't even raise its horned head there, bliss.
I've told you before and I will tell you again the UK does not have a state broadcaster - stop putting out these lies.
You claim to hate the lies the media give but more than happy to put out your own.
|
Avoid the state broadcaster completely, my two traffic warning systems mean i don't need 'traffic' on the radio so the SB doesn't even raise its horned head there, bliss.
I've told you before and I will tell you again the UK does not have a state broadcaster - stop putting out these lies.
You claim to hate the lies the media give but more than happy to put out your own.
I think you're taking GB's comments too far - they just mean 'the BBC', not implying some Soviet-style mouthpeice organisation.
|
.
I think you're taking GB's comments too far - they just mean 'the BBC', not implying some Soviet-style mouthpeice organisation.
It's an amusing past-time upsetting lefties Andy, mainly because they take themselves so seriously, its like having ones very own pet stalker.
Yes it is the state broadcaster no matter how many times Alan tells me i am wrong because despite the fact i'd rather eat glass than have to listen watch or read a single item from that organisation, i have to pay the stand and deliver demands or get visited by its goons and possibly go to prison, as i am compelled with no choice to pay this tax it is therefore part of the state machine, as such it is the state broadcaster.
This state (hoho) of affairs won't change of course despite what PM Johnson might waffle about, possibly changing the offence of not paying from criminal to civil will make it easier for the state to get judgement in its favour as proof requirements change drastically, lawyers win again, financing the broadcaster in this day and age should be via subscription or by advertising revenue or a combination, let them earn their place and pay realistic salaries to those who deserve them, rather than the obsecne amounts the right luvvies pocket.
It might help save some money if they didn't need to send oddjob and a crew out to stand in the street outside number 10's closed door, complete with yet another copper on guard, or wherever in the country the story applies, do they think the viewers are so thick that a story about number 10 would pass them by unless a crew was there for 2 minutes of waffle (thankyou Ben and back to the studio where we'll repeat what was just said for the thickies at the back) the studio hosts could have said as effectively without any of that expensive pointless t***, similarly do they really need some outside broadcast jockey and crew to titillate viewers with Philipa's hair and coat tails flapping in the wind, talk about throwing money about like confetti but then its always been easy spending other peoples money.
They could start being commercial by paying rent to the country for the premises they enjoy which the country owns as far as i can see, become a viable business in their own right as it were and do or die like any other business, the country sold the rest of its national silver to private profiteers how come the BBC escaped, one can surmise the reasons for oneself.
Edited by gordonbennet on 09/02/2020 at 13:17
|
Epic rant! :-)
|
Epic rant! :-)
Thanks :-)))
|
|
|
.
I think you're taking GB's comments too far - they just mean 'the BBC', not implying some Soviet-style mouthpeice organisation.
It's an amusing past-time upsetting lefties Andy, mainly because they take themselves so seriously, its like having ones very own pet stalker.
As one of the lefties here let me disabuse you of idea that I'm upset. I'm disturbed by racism or sexism and comments like yours about pencil necked bicycle riders rile me a bit.
Sometimes, as on that one I cannot be assed to respond.
However there are other occasions where I just want to put the contrary argument or deal with stuff that is, frankly, unsubstantiated assertion.
Also, I enjoy debate.
|
.
I think you're taking GB's comments too far - they just mean 'the BBC', not implying some Soviet-style mouthpeice organisation.
It's an amusing past-time upsetting lefties Andy, mainly because they take themselves so seriously, its like having ones very own pet stalker.
As one of the lefties here let me disabuse you of idea that I'm upset. I'm disturbed by racism or sexism and comments like yours about pencil necked bicycle riders rile me a bit.
Sometimes, as on that one I cannot be assed to respond.
However there are other occasions where I just want to put the contrary argument or deal with stuff that is, frankly, unsubstantiated assertion.
Also, I enjoy debate.
The question is though, what are the motives for putting forward a 'contrary argument'? I suspect some might argue that from time to time 'enjoying debate' can very closely resemble 'deliberate trolling' of people who come from the other end of the political spectrum, especially when they know they've lost that debate.
We all do need to be careful (myself included) - like the best of us, we can get swept up in the heat of the moment or make debates more of an 'argument' or 'battle', more like those on newspaper websites.
|
.
I think you're taking GB's comments too far - they just mean 'the BBC', not implying some Soviet-style mouthpeice organisation.
It's an amusing past-time upsetting lefties Andy, mainly because they take themselves so seriously, its like having ones very own pet stalker.
As one of the lefties here let me disabuse you of idea that I'm upset. I'm disturbed by racism or sexism and comments like yours about pencil necked bicycle riders rile me a bit.
Sometimes, as on that one I cannot be assed to respond.
However there are other occasions where I just want to put the contrary argument or deal with stuff that is, frankly, unsubstantiated assertion.
Also, I enjoy debate.
The question is though, what are the motives for putting forward a 'contrary argument'? I suspect some might argue that from time to time 'enjoying debate' can very closely resemble 'deliberate trolling' of people who come from the other end of the political spectrum, especially when they know they've lost that debate.
Is that what you do?
|
|
|
.
I think you're taking GB's comments too far - they just mean 'the BBC', not implying some Soviet-style mouthpeice organisation.
It's an amusing past-time upsetting lefties Andy, mainly because they take themselves so seriously, its like having ones very own pet stalker.
Not upset Gordon -I expect nothing more else from you - you spout lies as fact quite often. Just sad that others believe what you say. The BBC is not the state broadcaster and never has been.
|
|
|
Avoid the state broadcaster completely, my two traffic warning systems mean i don't need 'traffic' on the radio so the SB doesn't even raise its horned head there, bliss.
I've told you before and I will tell you again the UK does not have a state broadcaster - stop putting out these lies.
You claim to hate the lies the media give but more than happy to put out your own.
I think you're taking GB's comments too far - they just mean 'the BBC', not implying some Soviet-style mouthpeice organisation.
Not according to his 'epic rant' that you enjoyed so much! LOL
|
|
|
|
|
Some 13 years ago i bought a used VW Polo with the bog standard fitted FM/CD arrangement. As i had spent much less of my budget on the car, i decided to have a Pioneer head unit fitted with a breakout DAB receiver. I already owned a Pure DAB personal radio and although back then the signal was patchy i took the risk for the car.
After about 4 years, the old Pioneer with external DAB receiver wasn't performing well and i kept losing signal. I upgraded to another Pioneer single DIN head unit with built in DAB. The reception was so good i wasn't even losing signal in tunnels and could stay tuned to radio stations way out of London.
Sometime later, i bought a used MK 5 Golf, again with the standard radio equipment. I swapped this out for another Pioneer, this time a 7" touch screen with built in DVD player and lots of other features including Spotify capability. This was the best head unit i've ever had and DAB signal was flawless.
Last year, i bought a MK 7 Golf with it's own DAB unit built in. DAB reception is awful and the car has a recall to rectify this known issue. Sadly, the only aftermarket unit that is compatible with this car and all it's built in features is an Alpine unit that costs an eye watering £1800 to buy...plus fitting costs! But if money was no object, i'd have already had it fitted.
I'm not an audiophile but i love playing music in the car and as an early adopter i have to say, DAB is definitely a positive for me.
My MK 7 also comes with a CD player in the glove box....i can honestly say it will never get used. I have a USB stick permanently connected for my own music.
The car also comes with an EPB with hill hold assist. I was a little sceptical at first but decided to make full use of them and have grown to love its convenience. I'm not as sold on the ACC which i've tried a few times and it works well but i can't bring myself to let the cars' tech to have that much control.
|
|
|