My 2.0. engines are the later 16 valve 138 hp, they are used in many different cars and seem to be proving reliable. Yes, the earlier 8 valve engines were very reliable but the 16 valve hasn't proved otherwise so far.
The 1.6 was problematic when it first came out although I suspect some of the problem was lack of oil changes but this engine didn't tolerate dirty oil very well with numerous turbo failures.
The oil feed to the turbo had an in line filter which clogged up and starved the turbo of oil causing bearing/seal failure. The problem was exacerbated by a small sump which couldn't be completely drained. It has received some modifications to improve matters but I don't know when this happened.
The Ford 1.6 which was based on this engine suffered the same problems although there are fewer reports of problems now.
If you are looking at a 1.6 I would suggest removing the oil filler cap and checking for any loose carbon deposits inside and also the history to see if it has ever had the turbo replaced.
If you decide on one give it an immediate oil change and make regular changes at less than the recommended interval.
I have never owned a 1.6 but have read very much about its failures, in fact it was a major content of some car forums for some time.
I would do some research on the net.
Edited by Peter.N. on 28/01/2020 at 11:04
|