What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - catsdad
We are just about to buy our son's 2012 Mazda 3 from him as our second car and it's due a service. It will do about 1500 miles a year so I will stick it on a two year service schedule at our indie with a once over at the time of the intervening MOT.

Assuming it's got OEM iridium plugs these will be due a change. Should I go to the expense of like for like or, considering the low useage, should I simply go for standard plugs with the biannual service.

I take it that minor performance characteristics aside there is no harm in reverting to standard plugs? In fact having them out every couple of years might be preferred to leaving iridiums in place for the rest of its serviceable life?
Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - Engineer Andy

Not a good idea to skip services. This is a chain-driven engine and despite what some say, low annual mileage isn't good for engines over the long term without fresh oil once a year - that's why its 12.5k miles or 1 year between services. My car often (as it does at the moment) does low annual mileages, but I still get it serviced as per the schedule every year - if you can't afford to replace the engine or car, then to me it's not worth taking the risk by servicing every two years.

If I remember correctly, my service schedule on my gen-1 car (2005 build 1.6 petrol) has 75k miles between replacements for the iridium spark plugs. I suspect that standard plugs can be used (check with your local main dealer) but would likely need to be changed far more often as they did on older cars.

Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - catsdad

Thanks for the plugs comments Andy but I take a different view on servicing and wear.

With your service regime our engine might well in theory last another, say, 50k miles or more, taking it to 120k. However that's 30 odd years at our mileage. It would be overtaken by age and the failure of items of items that are not part of service long before that .

Even if biannual servicing were, for the sake of argument, to double the wear rate then its still got another 15 years or 25k miles left in it. Again that's long after it will have been scrapped.

So if we get it to last for the next 8 years/12k miles/4 services. I will be quite happy.

If we unload it before then it will be a very fastidious buyer who would not buy an aged car just because its only been serviced every 3k miles. When my son was buying the Mazda he was looking at 6 year old cars and the majority did not have a fsh so now that its 8 years old the regime I am proposing will be good compared to the norm.

Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - misar

Thanks for the plugs comments Andy but I take a different view on servicing and wear.

Your view is too simplistic. A couple of examples.

1. You assume that all that matters is the mileage per year but how the miles are accumulated is more important with the engine. Your 1500 pa could mean 300 trips of 5 miles each or 10 trips of 150. The latter will result in less wear than say 5000 pa, the former likely causes far more wear per year even though fewer miles. Most low mileage cars except perhaps classics are closer to the 300 than the 10 trips pa.

2. Neglecting the engine oil cannot be equated to x fewer years of life in the car assuming a linear rate of wear. It will likely cause catastrophic failure which with an old car means a write off. Most other components which wear out simply have a life expectancy which depends on either amount of use (eg bearings and brakes) or age (eg rubber seals and hoses). Most of those components can still be economically replaced in an older car.

Edited by misar on 20/01/2020 at 22:51

Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - edlithgow

Thanks for the plugs comments Andy but I take a different view on servicing and wear.

Your view is too simplistic. A couple of examples.

2. Neglecting the engine oil cannot be equated to x fewer years of life in the car assuming a linear rate of wear. It will likely cause catastrophic failure which with an old car means a write off.

Your "short-tripping" and other comments (1) seem valid but your view on oil seems a simplistic exaggeration, and/because it reles on an unsupported statement, and fails to define terms such as "neglecting"

If you attempted to dellve into the actual research data on extending oil change intervals at low miles, (not easy) I seriously doubt you would find any support for your "likely" catastrophic failure, unless oil change (or oil replenishment) was postponed indefinately.

For example, wear rates (from specroscopically measured metals in the oil, an imperfect but practical method) actually often decline on extended OCI's, and increase just after an oil change. This is probably due to formation/removal of a protective "tribolayer" on surfaces.

Reality is complicated.

Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - misar

For example, wear rates (from specroscopically measured metals in the oil, an imperfect but practical method) actually often decline on extended OCI's, and increase just after an oil change. This is probably due to formation/removal of a protective "tribolayer" on surfaces.

Reality is complicated.

Indeed.

Feel free to apply your superior technical knowledge and safeguard your engine's "tribolayers" indefinitely. Whether or not that eventually results in engine failure is of course a matter of chance. Good luck to you and your engine.

I prefer to apply common sense and "waste" a few pounds per year to follow the collective wisdom of mechanics and many manufacturers. The advice from my manufacturer is to change the oil and filter every 12 months even if the mileage is below the recommended change point and I have no problem with that even though my annual mileage is very low.

Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - edlithgow

For example, wear rates (from specroscopically measured metals in the oil, an imperfect but practical method) actually often decline on extended OCI's, and increase just after an oil change. This is probably due to formation/removal of a protective "tribolayer" on surfaces.

Reality is complicated.

Indeed.

Feel free to apply your superior technical knowledge and safeguard your engine's "tribolayers" indefinitely. Whether or not that eventually results in engine failure is of course a matter of chance. Good luck to you and your engine.

I prefer to apply common sense and "waste" a few pounds per year to follow the collective wisdom of mechanics and many manufacturers. The advice from my manufacturer is to change the oil and filter every 12 months even if the mileage is below the recommended change point and I have no problem with that even though my annual mileage is very low.

Ah, Collective Wisdom.

There's a lot of it about.

Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - craig-pd130

Have a look at prices on sites like www.sparkplugs.co.uk (I've bought from them for years).

The cost difference between iridium and standard plugs is sometimes no more than a couple of quid per plug, if the plug is a type that's fitted to many makes and models of car.

My 10 pence worth is this: Iridiums would be of more benefit in low-mileage / stop-start driving than they would be if you were doing average miles per year - so I'd be more likely to fit them for the type of driving you'll be doing.

Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - gordonbennet

I'd judge how difficult these things are to fit, if a simple 20 minute job then standard quality will do fine, if a nightmare of a job ie boxer Subarus then put something in that's going to last as long as possible.

Presumably we are talking NGK whatever the metal is supposed to be in the tip.

Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - catsdad
Thanks gents for the plug comments.
I believe the OEM fit is NGK. Price on the spark plugs site mentioned is £60 for four. This is versus £8 for 4 traditional plugs by Bosch from "car parts for less" and is presumably in line with what my indie would routinely fit. I am sure he will fit whatever I want on my car and price accordingly.

I wanted to be able to have an informed discussion when I book it in as to what's best - iridium forever or new standard plugs every service. I am now tending towards the iridium option.

As for asking the Mazda dealer I have just rung them to ask what their advertised Motorlux Trust 5 service for cars over 5 years old entails (to see how it compares to the indie) and the service desk didn't actually know. They promised to call me back.....that was over an hour ago. What chance a sensible conversation about plugs on that basis!
Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - catsdad
Well I take it all back re the Mazda dealer.

The service manager did call me back and he was excellent. He sounded about 60, was very non-corporate and knew what he was talking about, including suggesting I speak to him direct about what we do next year given the low mileage. Meanwhile he wants our current service business.

He had already looked at the online history and knew exactly what was due. First off plugs can be deferred until the next service. He discounted the current service quote in view of the car's age and good service history. So he can do the service for £220. This compares to £150 at the indie but the Mazda service does include the gear box oil which I like having done. So not that far apart and of course the Mazda fsh would be maintained.

I will book it in there as soon as we pick it up. As for where I get the plugs and any further service done next year that decision can wait. However I now feel reassured that a sensible discussion should be possible. Although my indie is very good I will probably go the Mazda route for the iridium plugs given the possibility of seizure when they have been in for so long.

Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - gordonbennet

coo, an old school service manager, one or two still dotted about but an endangered species.

Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - Engineer Andy

Yep, that's Mazda for you - one dealer, excellent (talking about after sales here), another, absolute carp. Not sure whether they were like that before the tie up with Ford, but they are still highly variable in quality. The best one I've heard of is in the Norwich area and regularly wins awards. If you find yours is a good'un, then stick with them, it's well worth it.

Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - madf

My Jazz's spark plugs are 7 years old. NGK iridums. Lots of diismantling to access them..

I am not doing them till 55k miles.. Car mpg on long runs is better than it ever has been after 44k miles. (approx 54mpg versus 52).and they should be replaced at 75k..

PIA job and £60...for no benefit.

Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - focussed

Just make sure you fit NGK plugs, iridium or not it doesn't matter.

I've fitted thousands of them, and I have never known one fail due to a manufacturing fault.

I've known problems with other makes, Bosch, Champion, AC but never with NGK.

Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - edlithgow
Although my indie is very good I will probably go the Mazda route for the iridium plugs given the possibility of seizure when they have been in for so long.

Americans seem to like putting anti-seize on the threads, though I believe NGK say they are plated so this shouldn't be necessary .

I've never bothered, and have never had a problem, but then I've never had a car where removing plugs was a non-trivial job. I take them out quite often, for various reasons.

Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - craig-pd130
Although my indie is very good I will probably go the Mazda route for the iridium plugs given the possibility of seizure when they have been in for so long.

Americans seem to like putting anti-seize on the threads, though I believe NGK say they are plated so this shouldn't be necessary .

I've never bothered, and have never had a problem, but then I've never had a car where removing plugs was a non-trivial job. I take them out quite often, for various reasons.

Yes, NGK specifically say not to use anti-seize / copper grease. I've never known a plug to seize in place in any of my cars - not even with the Ford Zetec engines which use those horrible taper-seat plugs.

I think it's especially unlikely with modern engines that typically bury the plug under a coil pack that has substantial rubber sealing boots, which is itself under a plastic cover ... road spray doesn't get at the plugs easily anymore.

Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - edlithgow

If I was going to do it I'd use Aluslip (or whatever its called).

Less chance of electrochemical incompatability/corrosion.

I think some people also use nickel-based antiseize in that role, though I don't remember seeing any.

If you say plugs in modern engines tend to be better protected I believe you, but I'd bet they also tend to be a bigger PITA to remove.

Edited by edlithgow on 22/01/2020 at 15:40

Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - John F

Can't see the point of expensive plugs if doing only a few miles a year. I see from my records I gave my 1980 TR7 new plugs in 1990 at 54,400 miles. Since then it has had five oil and filter changes, with mileage now at only 71,000 miles. Plugs cleaned and checked in 2008 at 64,000 miles. Robust English chain cam engine, runs sweetly, turns 40 this year.

Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - craig-pd130

Robust English chain cam engine, runs sweetly, turns 40 this year.

A thought occurred to me. As Saab used its development of the Triumph slant-4 into the 90s, is it possible to borrow some of Saab's plumbing to graft a turbo onto the TR7, as an alternative to the usual Rover V8 transplant?

Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - craig-pd130

If you say plugs in modern engines tend to be better protected I believe you, but I'd bet they also tend to be a bigger PITA to remove.

There's more gubbins to move out of the way before you can pull the plugs, but I've found they always come out easily enough. This is helped by the fact that cars now tend to use smaller, 10 or 12mm thread plugs to make room in the cylinder head for 4 valves / cylinder, and these simply can't be tightened as firmly as traditional plugs.

Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - focussed

Interesting you say that about "Americans seem to like putting anti-seize on the threads"

I used to service a lot of GM based V-8 motors which use 14 mm taper seat plugs and due to the plug location in a marine motor, under the large water cooled exhaust manifold, I used to use anti-seize on the taper, not the thread. to ease removing them next time around.

Mazda 3 - Spark plugs iridium or not? - edlithgow

Interesting you say that about "Americans seem to like putting anti-seize on the threads"

I used to service a lot of GM based V-8 motors which use 14 mm taper seat plugs and due to the plug location in a marine motor, under the large water cooled exhaust manifold, I used to use anti-seize on the taper, not the thread. to ease removing them next time around.

Not knocking it, just never found it necessary.

It could well be that with a wider experience of newer or different engines (V8's would be a lot commoner in US experience) I might have found it useful, paqrticularly in a marine context..

Here's a compendium of PITA American market plug changes. Big engines in a shrinking space seems to be the theme.

https://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/5334991/1

Americans do seem to tend to embrace the superfluous though. For example, power tools for the removal of "lug nuts" seem to be viewed as essential, with "power bleeders" for brakes not far behind.

Edited by edlithgow on 29/01/2020 at 15:00