I was standing in a well-known Surrey dealership on Friday and two customers could be heard discussing this issue heatedly with their respective service agents. I listened carefully to the pathetic, disingenuous, DS-planation being given to the owner of a 30 month old Discovery Sport which had seen its first service at 2 years old. The owner was demanding to know why his car required another service (for which they wanted to charge him £240) only 8 months and 6,000 miles after the first one. Of course, this question is straightforward for anybody who's been following this issue for the past two years: his car had been "upgraded" with N289 which meant that it had - for the first time since it left Halewood - a fully-functional, oil dilution-sensitive, service indicator. Of course, the rate of diesel dilution is no higher than it had been during the first two years, it's just that now this owner, like thousands of others, has been alerted to its presence.
The technical evidence suggests that Jaguar Land Rover sold tens of thousands of faulty 2.0 litre D8-chassis diesel cars from September 2015. "Faulty" in the sense that they all suffered from massive diesel dilution (indy repairers say that 20% dilution was common) while at the same time being fitted with a faulty service indicator that "conveniently" concealed the damaging effects of the oil contamination. Come on - what are the chances of that? Service intervals reduced on average by 60%, soot production up by a factor of 200% to 300%. Haven't I heard this somewhere else recently? Oh, yes that's right: Volkswagen cars AFTER cheat devices were forcibly removed following action in the courts. There's now a technical guide answering the OP's question and much more. Essential reading for any prospective buyer of the JLR D8 transverse diesel but priceless if you're trying to reject a poor quality, misrepresented money-pit.
www.dropbox.com/s/d0bcrd7sve4l598/D8_Dilution_Expl...1
Edited by Ta-Ta JLR on 10/11/2019 at 18:32
|