It doesn't have to be as JohnF so accurately describes, how much would it have cost to put some timing marks on the casings behind equivalent marks on the relevant sprockets at build stage, those sprockets Woodruff keyed or otherwise solidly locked in place on the crank/camshafts.
I know this is boring for many, but take the 4 cylinder Landcruiser/Hilux/Hiace engine, 2.5/3.0 litre as an example.
The cambelt drives one thing only, one camshaft, the other camshaft is geared from the driven one, its has timing marks on the engine casings, on the sprockets and on the belt itself, no need to remove any pipes, auxilliary belts or anything other than the cambelt cover, the water pump is driven by the auxilliary belt so lasts near enough forever.
6 bolts remove the camcover, then you turn the engine via the crank pulley to align the marks, 2 bolts undo the tensioner, slide the old belt off, 1 allen bolt sees the idler off, fit new idler, fit new untensioned tensioner, slide on new belt making sure all marks are still lined up, pull grenade pin from the tensioner which pushes against the idler which rides on the back of the belt, turn engine two revolutions to double check markings align, bingo job done, 1 hour first time with the most basic of tools, job could be done in a field miles from anywhere.
The other advantage of such simple belt design is that the belt isn't going through contortions all its life, it barely flexes backwards as it passes over the tensioner/idler.
There is no excuse for other vehicles to have camshaft drives requiring major surgery, even engine removal in some of the most ridiculous designs, there is also no reason whatsoever for a water pump or anything other than the camshafts to be driven by the cambelt, which is much tighter than any auxilliary belt putting more strain on the waterpump.
If engines are designed properly, belts are not only easy to replace, but they are easy to inspect in situ too.
|