I don't think anyone would be arguing that the premium may well change.... although experience has told me that a newer, more expensive, car need not necessarily be much more expensive than an older one. Safety equipment on a new car reducing the likelihood of injury maybe being just one of the factors perhaps?
You seem to be assuming a rational market. I'd say that's an unsupported assumption.
For example, long long ago in a country far far away from me, but probably quite close to you, I collected insurance quotes for an ex-BT diesel maestro van I was thinking of buying.
2L Perkins engine, and a biggish hike in premium.
"Why so much more than the petrol?" ses I
"Bigger engine" says the rep
"But its got less power" says I (I quoted the figures but can't remember them now)
"Err...well...diesels cost more to repair" says the rep
"But I'm insuring 3PFT, so that won't be your problem, will it?" ses I.
"Well, thats what it says on the computer" says the rep, which was the real reason, and what he should have said in the first place.
Re KB's mates situation, same thing happened to me. Fiesta pulled out in front of me at a junction and my Lada, with right of way, bent it quite a lot.
No claim made against my insurer and no claim made by me against the Fiesta's insurer (Lada wing was a bit distorted but easily hammered back) but I reported the incident and my premium went up a lot.
I changed insurers. All you can do AFAIK
Edited by edlithgow on 02/01/2019 at 12:29
|