Years ago-soon after i passed my driving test and got my first car, my father insisted that I learn't how to check the oil, radiator water(coolant), top up windscreen water, check tyre pressures(including spare) and also clutch and brake fluid master cylinders. He also taught me how to change a wheel, take it to be repaired and change it back again afterwards -then wash the spare tyre down and fit it back in the boot. Yes-very useful and to this day i still follow these basic guidelines, which have served me well. I seriously believe that the reason I hardly see anyone checking oil, checking tyres, checking anything under the bonnet is either because they ain't got a clue how to do it or possibly-just possibly-they could not care less?
|
I seriously believe that the reason I hardly see anyone checking oil, checking tyres, checking anything under the bonnet is either because they ain't got a clue how to do it or possibly-just possibly-they could not care less?
At least part of that is because car makers are gradually making it harder to do. More things under the bonnet are covered by black plastic, and less info is given in the owner's manual. All (presumably) to make more work for dealers, nominally in the interests of H&S. My car is 10 years old, but the manual says nothing about how to drain the oil, which I would happily do, except that it is extremely awkward without a hoist.
The other reason is that most cars will go on uncomplainingly for months or even years without treatment, so that easily becomes a habit. They even expect the tyres to tell you when they should be checked .....
|
Andrew T, your last comment is spot on. I've no plans to do my own servicing but have very good mechanical knowledge. I used to race motorbikes and carried out my own maintenance from oil change to full engine and gearbox rebuilds.
But modern cars are so much better mechanically than the cars I drove 30/35 years ago. Electrical and computer systems are a different matter and I wouldn't know where to start there. I do still check the fluids but it's been a long time since anything needed topping up!
So perhaps people do care but simply don't need to.
|
Andrew T, your last comment is spot on. I've no plans to do my own servicing but have very good mechanical knowledge. I used to race motorbikes and carried out my own maintenance from oil change to full engine and gearbox rebuilds.
But modern cars are so much better mechanically than the cars I drove 30/35 years ago. Electrical and computer systems are a different matter and I wouldn't know where to start there. I do still check the fluids but it's been a long time since anything needed topping up!
So perhaps people do care but simply don't need to.
I'm the same but health prevents me from doing anything except levels.though I need not check them Honda has sensors for over level oil and low level and they work but never needed to check water as it's always been spot on.
Even electrics are or should be really reliable though that seems to depend on who makes the electrics
|
<< Honda has sensors for over level oil and low level and they work but never needed to check water as it's always been spot on. Even electrics are or should be really reliable though that seems to depend on who makes the electrics. >>
Ah yes, the sensors. Again we can come to depend on them implicitly, tho on rare occasions they can misinform. Hopefully that may not be serious, but it should always be possible to make visual checks to confirm. My car still has a dipstick and transparent reservoirs for coolant and brake fluid, which I look at every few weeks despite the start-up 'Oil OK' message. I believe some swish cars don't always help there, and tyre pressure detectors can be irritating too.
|
Again we can come to depend on them implicitly
surprising how many people are sarcastic about sensors, I`m not that keen on TPS but have it.
and looking back on it, the only sensor I have had cause a problem was CPS when you got stuck in traffic for a long time where the sensor got hot, if you shut the engine off it wouldn`t start again for an hour, but as it only happened after traffic jams 3 times I never had it replaced Civic 2.2 diesel
there is also the point some are not able to check levels and some do not even know they have sensors
I do check everything but where I said never needed to check water it meant have the cap off, as level is visible without, as most cars.....
|
|
|
Andrew T, your last comment is spot on. I've no plans to do my own servicing but have very good mechanical knowledge. I used to race motorbikes and carried out my own maintenance from oil change to full engine and gearbox rebuilds.
But modern cars are so much better mechanically than the cars I drove 30/35 years ago. Electrical and computer systems are a different matter and I wouldn't know where to start there. I do still check the fluids but it's been a long time since anything needed topping up!
So perhaps people do care but simply don't need to.
I'm the same but health prevents me from doing anything except levels.though I need not check them Honda has sensors for over level oil and low level and they work but never needed to check water as it's always been spot on.
Even electrics are or should be really reliable though that seems to depend on who makes the electrics
I have a 4 month old VW Polo. Within a month the switch controlling the wipers failed. Thus in torrential rain the wipers stopped, leaving me with zero visibility., and that’s no exaggeration. Five minutes earlier and I would have been on the M3 and I can’t see how I would have avoided a multi car crash. A few weeks later the car refused to let me in. I had to walk home and get the spare keys. The emergency braking has gone off twice for no obvious reason, very scary. The radio has refused to turn off several times. When using CarPlay, the infotainment system has repeatedly crashed, though resetting my iPhone appears to have solved that one so VW 1, Apple 0. I suspect that the least reliable cars are those with the most toys, which is why many aspirational brands do badly.
|
<< I suspect that the least reliable cars are those with the most toys. >>
A fairly predictable situation, I think? Of course the first maker to present a new toy runs the risk of not having tested it sufficiently, so perhaps the Mk.2 version will work better.
|
|
Andrew T, your last comment is spot on. I've no plans to do my own servicing but have very good mechanical knowledge. I used to race motorbikes and carried out my own maintenance from oil change to full engine and gearbox rebuilds.
But modern cars are so much better mechanically than the cars I drove 30/35 years ago. Electrical and computer systems are a different matter and I wouldn't know where to start there. I do still check the fluids but it's been a long time since anything needed topping up!
So perhaps people do care but simply don't need to.
I'm the same but health prevents me from doing anything except levels.though I need not check them Honda has sensors for over level oil and low level and they work but never needed to check water as it's always been spot on.
Even electrics are or should be really reliable though that seems to depend on who makes the electrics
I have a 4 month old VW Polo. Within a month the switch controlling the wipers failed. Thus in torrential rain the wipers stopped, leaving me with zero visibility., and that’s no exaggeration. Five minutes earlier and I would have been on the M3 and I can’t see how I would have avoided a multi car crash. A few weeks later the car refused to let me in. I had to walk home and get the spare keys. The emergency braking has gone off twice for no obvious reason, very scary. The radio has refused to turn off several times. When using CarPlay, the infotainment system has repeatedly crashed, though resetting my iPhone appears to have solved that one so VW 1, Apple 0. I suspect that the least reliable cars are those with the most toys, which is why many aspirational brands do badly.
TBH I have never had or wanted a VW of any model due to so many reports of problems, imo even Ford were as bad, after Rover went down I stuck with Honda and have to say they have had faults but nowhere near as many as a lot of other cars, but again thats personal opinion and think I will stick with them!
I don`t agree the more toys they have the more chance of a problem as usually its a component failure rather than complete unit that goes down.
|
I am rather sceptical of surveys especially JD Power as they are not well done IMO and sometimes have bizarre results such as the Skoda Citigo being far more reliable than the VW Up: virtually the same car, made in the same factory, same engines, same mechanics, almost the same body same electrics, small cosmetic changes. That said, VW always do okay in surveys, about mid way ish, so not awful, not brilliant. The DSG gearbox seems to have a poor reputation. Nissan were said to be very good, I had an old style Micra, it had faults, and finally the ECU failed, an expensive repair.
|
I am rather sceptical of surveys especially JD Power as they are not well done IMO
Most people I know seem to want to keep up with the Jones`s and some wonder why they end up not affording the fuel and tyres for some motors, they are so concerned with I must have this motor, the running costs are not given a second thought, to some its bragging rights which imo is stupid if you are unable to run it without financial difficulty
Does anyone take notice of these surveys as no one I know does, the impression is given that only certain motors are given brilliant reviews...I may be wrong?
|
I am rather sceptical of surveys especially JD Power as they are not well done IMO
Most people I know seem to want to keep up with the Jones`s and some wonder why they end up not affording the fuel and tyres for some motors, they are so concerned with I must have this motor, the running costs are not given a second thought, to some its bragging rights which imo is stupid if you are unable to run it without financial difficulty
Somewhat off topic, but doubtless true. I notice people change car because they for example see a cam belt change coming up. The cost of changing a cam belt will be fare less than the cost to change.
Does anyone take notice of these surveys as no one I know does,
Interesting question, I don't know the answer. In my case I take notice of reviews, but not these surveys.
the impression is given that only certain motors are given brilliant reviews...I may be wrong?
That suggests some form of bias. Evidently there is a lot of money involved, and many marques do fly journalists out to all expenses paid jamborees. Hard to believe that has no influence, even if the journo is straight as an arrow.
|
|
|
<< I don`t agree the more toys they have the more chance of a problem as usually its a component failure rather than complete unit that goes down. >>
I don't see why that is any better - whether a whole thing fails, or just a part of it. It's still a failure, and may indicate incomplete 'road testing'. It may take years for weak points in a new device to reveal themselves. Don't we all know it?
|
<< I don`t agree the more toys they have the more chance of a problem as usually its a component failure rather than complete unit that goes down. >>
I don't see why that is any better - whether a whole thing fails, or just a part of it. It's still a failure, and may indicate incomplete 'road testing'. It may take years for weak points in a new device to reveal themselves. Don't we all know it?
My point was these parts should be repaired by either sending back to manufacturer or the garage repair the unit instead of, after OEM approval binning them, thats what they used to do, get a bin full of broken warranty parts wait six months to be told by OEMs to scrap them
it may be different now I don`t know, but for recycling reasons I see no reason why they cannot repair parts, apart from the profit side of it....reminds me of Apple lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|