I was reading an article in June's Car magazine on the new Cullinan and can't help noticing just how ugly it is!. I mean, it really is and awful looking thing, not just in detail, but also its proportions. The article i read was by Stephen Bayley, someone with a diferent perspective to a motoring journo who's articles i have enjoyed immensely in various (usually classic) car magazines. He is quite clearly in despair over it's appearance, at one point commenting,
"Taste is the last threshold of shame. No one has ever said: 'Do you know, i wish i had worse taste'. It is in this context the new Rolls-Royce SUV excels so effortlessly"
He ends the article by quoting what is presumably some markeying blurb from Rolls-Royce about the Cullinan being 'a new defination of luxury', followed by leaving the last word to Coco Chanel,
"Luxury is not the opposite of poverty, it is the opposite of vulgarity"
Here is a link to an article by the esteemed Gavin Green with some pics for those who have not seen it yet.
www.carmagazine.co.uk/car-news/first-official-pict.../
|