I agree that on the one hand, some less than scrupulous car park owners/management firms, especially in town centres/retail parks have (in my opinion) been obviously playing the system and exploiting the many loopholes in the law, including poor prescedents.
On the other hand, I know from personal experience being a resident director of a private housing development (essentially like an unpaid MP for a development that didn't have their roads adopted by the local council) that parking control is often really needed, especially when you live near a railway station or town centre, meaning commuters and shoppers (as well as residents and their visitors) think they can 'do anything', parking on other people's allocated spaces (which are very limited), on the pavements, commnual gardens (which we also pay for the upkeep) and block the roads (bin lorry staff have threatened not to come by on more than one occasion).
We rely on a parking control firm to keep things in check, and, unusually, we (the resident directors) have control over whether people are let off or not. I believe we are fair, and often give people the benefit of the doubt, far more often than commercial operations. But, to be able to stop repeat offenders (many of whom are other residents), the parking firm needs to be able to quickly get access to vehicle owner's details so that costs don't go through the roof, as they only get paid via tickets (they aren't on retainer and we don't get a cut from tickets).
Its a delicate balancing act to keep things fair to all parties, and, say, making it much more time-consuming and expensive to take matters to court because people don't want to pay fines will just encourage them all the more. What I don't like is that on both sides of the debate, too many people are (especially those in the media, pressure groups and politicians) tarring everyone with the same brush.
I agree that many parking control firms are very poor - we've gone through about 4 in under 10 years, but what we need is for decent land owners/management organisations to be given a decent set of tolls (in law) to enable them to keep parking for those who its for, but on the other side of the coin, to get rid of the dodgy parking firms and encourage a far greater degree of professionalism, honesty and fair play.
Unfortunately, we need parking controls as most housing developments (especially newer ones), whether publicly owned or privately run, as well as 'public' or retail car parks, have limited capacity and often people take the Mick by abusing often sensible rules designed to encourage fair play and to keep people (shop keepres and business owners) trading. I just hope we don't get a 'knee-jerk' reaction on this issue, ending up with a parking free-for-all, which could easily end up with many decent businesses closing, never mind violent disagreements between people where they believe they been wronged (e.g. a neighbour deliberately parking additional cars in another's space with no legal redress or backup from management firms or councils).
|