My aging (but still generally in good nick and well maintained) Mazda3 is due for its 12 year service and the MOT early in January (original registration date), and I have, up 'till last year had it serviced and MOTed at my local main dealer on the same day, almost always serviced first, then MOTed later in the day.
I'm happy to say that, thus far, it has always passed its MOT, although the service mechanic said last year that there was a chance that a wearing wheel bearing might result in a fail. Fortunately it didn't (though it was an 'advisory', only one of two recorded in its history), and I did have the part replaced as well as some work done on the brakes not long after.
I was wondering, given the age of the car (though it has only done about 63k miles), is there any worth in me bringing the annual service forward to early December, in case any potential MOT failures are discovered, hopefully giving me time to have them rectified before the later MOT date. Whilst I would generally trust my local main dealership, would they be tempted to 'bring up' 'potential MOT fails' to drum up business, rather than just report actual problems (as they did last year) and let the cards fall as they may.
For a car of this age, I wouldn't have thought that failed MOTs, even on minor items, makes much of a difference to the price it would receive (assuming any MOT fails were rectified and it passed) when I eventually sell/PX the car, given its probably worth in the region (private sale) of between £1250 - £2k.
Luckily (or unluckily, depending upon your viewpoint) I'm not working at the moment (I'm racking my brain to find a new career other than Building Services Engineering), so I don't really 'need' a car at the moment, but given its previous high reliability and my current situation (I'm doing OK financially, but wouldn't want to have to buy a replacement car unneccessarily), I'm looking to hang on to the car until it becomes to expensive to run.
Any thoughts on this subject would be welcome.
|