Not really sure range anxiety makes sense even for long distance trips. 400 miles is well within the range of most normally fuelled cars and will probably take between 6 - 8 hours driving depending on limits, conditions etc.
There may be a few of us with iron clad bladders happy to subsist on chocolate bars and crisps. But on long drives - eg: south of France to UK - I find a routine develops : 200m/3hrs coffee, facilities, 400m/6hrs coffee, facilities, petrol. Adds about 5 minutes to the stopped time.
Incidentally hybrids may not be the future. The only benefits could be in town where electric only below 30mph would displace city pollution to the suburbs, and fitting a smaller lighter ICE supplemented by a small battery for acceleration..
Fundamentally the energy required to make a car go is related to weight, size and aerodynamic efficiency. Hybrids typically add complexity, weight and cost. A Prius driven (say) 1000miles over assorted roads will use just as much fuel as its petrol only equivalent, and more than a diesel.
I have a 560 mile trip to Scotland in a few days - three "comfort" breaks plus a lunch stop - about 12 hours overall.
If I had £130,000 I could buy a Tesla S with the big battery but even that only has a range of 270 miles at motorway speeds - the location of the last Supercharger point on my route is in the Borders and would mean running out of juice around Aviemore and needing an overnight stay to do a 13A recharge.
So two days to do a one day journey - and at "only" 560 miles, no refueling necessary with my present diesel and I'd still have a third of a tank left for exploring the North Coast.
Last Sunday we had a day out with bird-watching friends - 380 miles but stopping in places with no electricity let alone charging points.
Battery electric has a long way to go before they make my long list, let alone the short list.
Edited by RT on 15/06/2017 at 13:09
|