What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - chesterfieldhouse

Hello, late last year l bought a 2003 BMW 2.5 Z4, as a fun car. Haven't used it a great deal, due to the weather etc, though will when it improves. Its kept garaged & as its not used we leave the hand break off & use chocks. Talking with a mechanic, he recommended premium fuel which, he said, would help with this engine when left standing.

Any thoughts about this?

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - skidpan

Fuel degrades when its left standing, even expensive premium fuel. When I put my Caterham away for the winter I try and have as little petrol in as possible. In spring my first trip is to Asda to top it up with fresh petrol.

You should use the fuel with the Ron recomended by BMW. If they say 98 any less wil result in lower ,pg and less performance. If they say 95 no point in using better stuff.

As for branded or supermarket its the same fuel form the sames tanks at the same depots. All they supposedly do is add some snake oil if its going to Shell, BP etc and pretend its better for your car. Total b0110cks.

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - RobJP

As a counterpoint, HJ (the man himself) only uses premium fuels - usually Shell. He reckons it keeps fuel systems cleaner, and leads to fewer problems.

On average, currently, premium unleaded is about 10p per litre more expensive than normal unleaded. So that's roughly £5 extra cost each time you fill up.

If you don't use the car a lot, then you might only be filling it up 10 times a year (that's still about 3k miles, so you might be filling it less often). At 10 fillups, that's an extra £50.

If it saves you a single problem every year, then it's paid for itself just in a diagnostic fee. Never mind repair costs and/or further investigations.

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - SLO76
I'd keep as little fuel in it while it's going to be sitting as possible then fill up with good quality BP or Shell fuel when you intend on enjoying it.

Despite what others will tell you the additive package the large firms put into their product does make a difference and in over 23 years of driving, owning and trading cars I've never had one problem with fueling issues, a gummed up EGR or clogged DPF while many others I know use supermarket fuel constantly have at least one of the above.

With one exception when I did a wee experiment using a Renault Kangoo 1.9 diesel van I used for my business. I used nothing but Morrisons fuel, which was handy since the station was directly accross the road from my shop but I did soon notice a small reduction in (already limited) performance, worse fuel economy and an increase in exhaust smoke plus it was slower to start. Rather than persevere I switched back to BP and it improved noticeably.

Every mechanic I spoke to on this subject agrees that nonstop use of supermarket is a cause of many problems on modern engines and not one of them I know uses supermarket fuel regularly. It's the opinions of people who spend most of their lives under car bonnets i'll trust on this subject.

If unsure ask a few mechanics for their opinions and I'll bet the majority if not all will mirror mine.

Edited by SLO76 on 04/03/2017 at 18:25

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - chesterfieldhouse

Mmmm, interesting. What about, as oppposed to using premium fuel, putting a shot of Redex (or other) into a tank of Supermarket fuel?

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - FP

That's what I do; supermarket petrol plus Miller's. Present car (Focus Mk2, 2-litre) has done over 70,000 miles with me. Fuel consumption 38 - 45 mpg depending on conditions. EGR valve replaced a year ago (not uncommon, apparently); nothing else fuel-related.

Previously, I had a Peugeot 306 HDi which I treated similarly - supermarket diesel plus equivalent Miller's. I put over 100,000 miles on it. Average consumption 53 mpg - never seemed to vary. No fuel-related issues whatsoever.

Two cars, I hasten to add, that were/have been outstandingly reliable and trouble-free, and a pleasure to drive.

Edited by FP on 04/03/2017 at 19:58

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - SLO76
If you're limited to using supermarket fuel by location then an additional aftermarket additive would be a wise bet. My old man used to swear by Redex and had no trouble any car he ever had while I knew him, though to be fair he never kept them long enough to worry, with a change of wheels often annually. He did run a Renault Extra van as a working vehicle for 14yrs without any engine issues at all though.

Edited by SLO76 on 04/03/2017 at 21:02

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - liammcl

I use shell premium unleaded on my 1997 1.1 peugeot 106 (105,000 miles )
and it purrs along on it. normal supermarket makes it more hesitant in the wet and cold from a cold start.

It is all together a lot nicer drive and more "sporty" ...well, as sporty as it's gonna get , with the premium fuel .

Surprisingly...The miles per £ are exactly the same between using posh fuel and everylittle helps fuel.

Also, at the filling up station , I think I get a certain swagger, when wlaking to the cashier, from filling up with the most expensive fuel :D lol

in fact, when I recently went for insurance, they quoted my car as being worth £95-£145.
a full tank of v power in it , is worth about £60
so my actual car is worth £30 to £85 :)

The posh petrol is worth the same as my whole car :D

Cheers
LIam

Edited by liammcl on 04/03/2017 at 22:15

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - skidpan

My advice to use supermarket fuel is based on fact and not on heresay or the advice of actors wearing white coats.

We have been using supermarket fuel almost exclusively since Asda opened a filling station in the mid 80's. We now use a mixture of Asda and Tesco, just depends where we shop. In those 30 years we have had a total of 16 cars (18 if you include the 2 Caterhams) which have covered a total of just over 600,000 miles.

In those 30+ years and 600,000+ miles we have never suffered a fuel related problem, using branded fuel could not have reduced that failure rate. All the car have run perfectly from day one to the day we sold them (one did 113,000 miles in just over 7 years), using branded fuel would not have improved that.

We have never used additives, the handbooks have always said DON'T.

So based on experience I will continue to say just use whichever fuel is most convenient. If it branded buy that, if its a supermarket buy that.

I will also say don't bother with additives. All cars sold in Europe are designed to use the relevant EN approved petrol or diesel and that is all you can buy. Look inside to fuel flap, it will tell you in there what grade of fuel you require.

The only fuel I would be never buy is that sold by a small garage with a small turnover and ancient tanks (regardless of brand).

One last comment, every time fuel increases in price a new thread is started or an old one resurected with loads of moans about the price of fuel. Yet some drivers are quite happy to pay more than they need to all the time.

Edited by skidpan on 05/03/2017 at 13:02

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - RobJP

We have never used additives, the handbooks have always said DON'T.

You are aware that BMW, Mercedes, VAG, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Vauxhall, Volvo - along with a host of others, actually SELL fuel additives to go in the tank, which are advertised as 'helping to keep your fuel system clean' ?

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - SLO76
As before I'd stick with the advice from people who actually work on cars for a living. They see customers on a daily basis with fuelling problems and are best placed to pass an informed opinion on whether cheap fuel is likely to have a negative impact on your car over the longterm. Every mechanic I've spoken to on this subject has had given a negative response to supermarket fuel and as a salesman and later a home trader I've spent plenty of time hanging around in workshops listening to moaning mechanics over the years.

Edited by SLO76 on 05/03/2017 at 13:32

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - skidpan

You are aware that BMW, Mercedes, VAG, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Vauxhall, Volvo - along with a host of others, actually SELL fuel additives to go in the tank, which are advertised as 'helping to keep your fuel system clean' ?

You pointed out the BMW one the other week and it works out at 20 pence a litre, what a rip off. Imagine the public outcry if fuel went up 20 pence a litre overnight. The manual for our new Superb (a VAG product) clearly says "use no fuel or oil additives" so that is exactly what I will do.

As they used to say " a fuel and his money".

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - FP

This topic is an old favourite which never ceases to arouse passions - I've no idea why.

These are the three positions assumed by those who contribute: all comparable fuel is of the same quality, fuel additives don't work and you shouldn't use them; comparable fuel varies from filling station to filling station, fuel additives do work and various people with experience recommend them. Little, if any, evidence apart from the anecdotal is available to support either of these arguments and the experience of one driver over a few hundred thousand miles in a handful of vehicles is too small to be significant statistically.

The third position is that fuel additives may be helpful and it's worth putting a few pence per litre into fuel expenditure. That is anyone's choice and is a perfectly sensible position to take up.

I shall continue to ignore the scorn of one poster here who has no more authority to pontificate on the topic than anyone else.

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - Wackyracer

Locally the cheapest diesel is 117.7 and the cheapest premium diesel is 130.9 so adding millers to the cheapest diesel at a cost of 2 pence per litre and getting increased Cetane, some extra cleaning and lubrication seems like good value to me.

People can bang their own drum to whatever tune they want.

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - chesterfieldhouse

l've had a look at the handbook & on fuel it says Super Plus/premium (98 RON) is the fuel of preference & this will achieve rated performance & best consumption.

Then goes onto state you can also run the engine on Premium grade petrol (95 RON)

With the minimum grade of fuel being Regular grade (91 RON)

l guess, now the the weather will start to get better & l'll use the car more, l'll try premium, see if that makes any difference. Then with an additive in supermarker fuel & then perhaps with supermarket fuel alone.

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - RobJP

You are aware that BMW, Mercedes, VAG, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Vauxhall, Volvo - along with a host of others, actually SELL fuel additives to go in the tank, which are advertised as 'helping to keep your fuel system clean' ?

You pointed out the BMW one the other week and it works out at 20 pence a litre, what a rip off. Imagine the public outcry if fuel went up 20 pence a litre overnight. The manual for our new Superb (a VAG product) clearly says "use no fuel or oil additives" so that is exactly what I will do.

As they used to say " a fuel and his money".

Now, I'll direct you to a webpage - this one actually has a picture of a bottle of VAG group additive on it (though I will concede that this picture was not taken in the UK).

www.audi-sport.net/xf/threads/audi-g17-fuel-additi.../

For those not willing to click on a link, I'll describe the bottle - it's a yellowish liquid, in a bottle like you'd get in Southern Europe for small 'tourist' bottles of limoncello, ouzo, or the like. It states on it (in several languages including English) "Multipurpose additive for petrol". It has on it the VW, Audi, SEAT ... and SKODA logos.

Further down, there's what looks suspiciously exactly like the BMW/Merc additive 'tins' that I mentioned the other week. With VW, Audi and (once again) SKODA badges on.

So, first you state that all handbooks you've ever seen prohibit the use of additives - shown to be false.

Now you say that SKODA say never to use additives ... shown to be false, as they sell their own 'branded' ones.

You talk about 'a fuel and his money'. At your rate, you'll be going down the route of John F, and warning people to only change their tyres every 30 years.

Another saying for you - You can take a horse to water, but you can't make it drink. Or, to rephrase it a bit, you can show someone something sensible, but if they're of the flat-earth variety, they won't take a blind bit of notice.

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - Glaikit Wee Scunner {P}

Fuel additives

Unleaded petrol in accordance with the EN 228 standard1) meets all the conditions

for a smooth-running engine. We therefore recommend that no fuel additives

are used. This can result in considerable damage to parts of the engine

or the exhaust system.

I think that is a prohibition.

Straight from my Skoda owners manual. UK spec.I trust that advice.

Edited by Glaikit Wee Scunner {P} on 12/03/2017 at 18:25

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - skidpan

Strange as it might seem it says exactly the same in mine.

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - Avant

"l've had a look at the handbook & on fuel it says Super Plus/premium (98 RON) is the fuel of preference & this will achieve rated performance & best consumption.

Then goes onto state you can also run the engine on Premium grade petrol (95 RON)."

If that's what it says in the handbook, follow it. No harm in filling up with 95 RON if you can't find 98. I had a 2.2 straight-six Z3 a few years ago which pinked on regular, so I used premium.

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - John F

My Audi handbook recommends premium 98RON but can also use regular 95RON ' with slight loss of power under certain conditions...' which, with twelve busy pistons silently churning away, is not an issue for me. Also, 91RON 'in an emergency' - presumably in rural USA or eastern Europe.

So about 2 years ago I did a careful brim-to-brim consumption analysis over 1000m with each grade. I found mileage was less than 10% better with premium, but as premium cost over 10% more than regular, I'm sticking to regular, with an occasional tankful of premium in the possibly erroneous belief that it might keep the injectors cleaner.

I strongly suspect there is more profit for petrol companies from so-called premium fuels!

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - skidpan

When I had my Golf GTi it clearly said in the handbook and on the fuel flap to use 98 RON but was 95 OK but expect less MPG and power. At the time there was not a single garage locally selling 98 RON, had to go probably 15 or so miles. So I ran it on 95 RON as it was fine. I eventually did an experiment and can honetly say it ran no better on the expensive stuff and did little better MPG, certainly not enough extra to cover the higher price and certainly not enough the cover the 30 mile round trip to buy it..

So I ran it on 95 RON, for 113,000 trouble free miles and that included many thousands of miles towing the Caterham virtually every weekend during the racing season.

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - Glaikit Wee Scunner {P}

I've looked carefully at the fuel spec for my Octavia 1.4l TSI 150 bhp. Stated to be 95 Octane minimum. The owners manual states i can get more mpg and power using higher Octane. This engine has got variable valve and injection timing. I don't do enough miles to do proper comparisons but i do fill up with the higher Octane stuff on occasion. Currently using 97 Octane from Sainsbury.

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - skidpan

I've looked carefully at the fuel spec for my Octavia 1.4l TSI 150 bhp. Stated to be 95 Octane minimum. The owners manual states i can get more mpg and power using higher Octane.

Very strange.

Got the handbook for the new Superb 1.4 TSi 150 in front of me now. Inside the filler cap it says "Unleaded Petrol min. 95 RON". In the handbook it says the following about min. 95 RON spec:

"Unleaded petrol min. 95 RON

Use min.95 RON petrol.

In an emergency petrol 91, 92 or 93 RON can be used (slight power loss, a slightly increased fuel consumption)"

There is no mention of any benefits to be had from using 98 RON fuel.

Had the Leon 140 PS TSi for aalmost 4 years and only ever used 95 RON as per the filler cap and its went like a rocket and averaged a true 45mpg.

I will be using 95 RON petrol unless Skoda amend their requirements.

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - skidpan

with twelve busy pistons silently churning away

What Audi do you have with 12 pistons?

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - Glaikit Wee Scunner {P}

¦ On vehicles using the prescribed unleaded petrol of min. 95 ROZ, the use of petrol with a higher octane number than 95 ROZ can lead to an increase in power and reduction in fuel consumption.

My filler cap says min 95 Octane, therefore the above statement from the manual applies.

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - Glaikit Wee Scunner {P}

Double post. Please delete.

Edited by Glaikit Wee Scunner {P} on 14/03/2017 at 21:15

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - John F

A very rare A8 SWB W12 sports quattro. Only a few hundred were made, and only about 60 RHDs were sold here. Took me ages to find a decent one. Lower geared final drive than the LWB gives stunning performance. Hardly anyone knows they exist - it's a great Q car!

BMW Z4 - BMW 2.5 Straight 6 Fuel - John F

with twelve busy pistons silently churning away

What Audi do you have with 12 pistons?

A very rare A8 SWB W12 sports quattro. Only a few hundred were made, and only about 60 RHDs were sold here. Took me ages to find a decent one. Lower geared final drive than the LWB gives stunning performance. Hardly anyone knows they exist - it's a great Q car!

PS sorry, forgot to copy question in last post which, without it, looks senseless.