"...the rich mixture washes the oil off the cylinder walls and accelerates wear."
Concrete, I seem to remember, many years ago, asking about the method you describe upthread, and being told something on the lines of the above. I had BL cars with legendary SU carburettors which were never a problem starting, hot or cold, so I never had to resort to that method.
When I first passed my driving test in 1967 I used to take a company van home, then pick people up the following morning for work. The method I used worked on all the vans I drove. A BL J4, Bedford CF, Commer etc. Seemed a universal method to fill the carb with fuel to facilitate an easy start. The newspaper made defrosting easier too. Couldn't afford it not to start and leave colleagues stranded. By the time vans got more sophistocated I had my first company car, an Escort which was great, even in winter. Cheers Concrete
|
Best advice for a cold morning, wear a thicker coat.
As for driving, in over 40 years I have treated the car exactly the same all year round, never had an issue with engine wear or head gasket failure. Drive according to the road conditions of course.
Edited by skidpan on 03/12/2016 at 08:46
|
|
|
"...the rich mixture washes the oil off the cylinder walls and accelerates wear."
Concrete, I seem to remember, many years ago, asking about the method you describe upthread, and being told something on the lines of the above. I had BL cars with legendary SU carburettors which were never a problem starting, hot or cold, so I never had to resort to that method
Concrete's method of full choke before switching off the previous night surely just fills the cylinders and manifold with rich mixture; the carburettor float chamber will be full of petrol anyway, won't it?
|
Almost all of my neighbours in the street where I live start the car up and let it idle for about 20 to 30 minutes or more to defrost the car. One chap even does it when it's not frosty so his little darling doesn't get into a cold car for the 2 minute drive to the school bus. I find this a little bit odd when many folk complain of the cost of fuel and often wonder how much it costs, or whether it is insignificant. I can't bring myself to adopt this technique as I perceive it to be wasteful and not exactly environmentally friendly. I was also taught from years ago that a rich mixture was indeed very bad for the engine internals. Am I outdated with this thinking? My own technique is either a bottle of warm water from the tap or a fan heater for 10 mins, which of course wastes electricity.
|
I hardly dare mention this, but does anyone here actually use their garage for its original purpose? It's amazing how straightforward getting going on a cold morning is if you do.
No scraping, no need for heated screens, warm water, defrosting sprays, freeing wipers, no waiting - just get in, start up and drive out. Best of all - no wasting fuel. Close the door with your remote and you're off.
Simples!
Edited by FP on 03/12/2016 at 21:28
|
I hardly dare mention this, but does anyone here actually use their garage for its original purpose? It's amazing how straightforward getting going on a cold morning is if you do.
No scraping, no need for heated screens, warm water, defrosting sprays, freeing wipers, no waiting - just get in, start up and drive out. Best of all - no wasting fuel. Close the door with your remote and you're off.
Simples!
No! Our house is 40 years old with a standard builder's garage - it was difficult enough getting a mk1 Escort in the '70s and cars are a lot wider now.
|
Same problem here, our house is about 25 years old, the garage will take my quite small W124 Merc coupe, not a hope in hell of getting the Landcruiser in unless i bale out the rear door and leave the garage door open.
Plus the tools and contents of the garage are worth more than the value of any of our cars.
|
Indeed - since WW2, homes have (for the same number of bedrooms) been getting smaller and smaller, especially in recent times, whereby most people use their garage (which often is smaller than those before) for storage of things that used to go inside the main house (quite often people can't afford that 'extra' bedroom to use as a store room for their junk etc).
My parents own a typical 1960s 3 bed house with a linked garage and store, but even with a Fiesta they find it difficult to fit it in (no powered door BTW), especially with their main freezer (only enough space in the k****** for a medium sized fridge freezer) being situated in the garage with other things. Its just too much trouble getting the car out (and in again) when you want to pop out to the shops, especially when you've got a nice driveway there instead next to the k****** door. Most people just put up with having to scrape/de-ice their cars as a result. For me, living in a flat with no garage (just an allocated parking space), I have no choice at all.
I wouldn't be able to fit my Mazda3 in that garage, a car which is considered to be of average size - it was bad enough with my 3dr Micra, especially as the long doors were more difficult to open than if it were a 5dr model. Sizes of garages (as well as sizes of homes/amount of specific storage space they provide) need to be larger.
|
We live in a 1929 semi and our attached garage is quite large with a loft area occupying about half of the area overhead.
We have two cars, mine being a new MK7 Golf - too large for the width of this garage but my partner was able to buy a runabout car for herself to replace her 10 year old Fiesta. Unfortunately, this could not be the new Fiesta shape as, like all new cars they all seem to be longer, wider and lower than their predecessors. Being the case, we looked at the Hyundai range and ended up with an i10 - couldn't have chosen a nicer car and what's more it goes into the garage easily.
Most people seem to spurn their garages for some of the reasons given above probably buying cars bigger than they perhaps really need or filling their garages with junk/chest freezers etc.
Edited by oldgit on 04/12/2016 at 11:26
|
|
Don't worry, pretty soon people will be buying cupboards just big enough to take a sleeping human, and these will be linked together to save space.
Meanwhile we'll keep breeding and producing Jeremy Kyle style wasters to take over the land.
And the news will say our quality of life just keeps improving.
|
|
|
|
I hardly dare mention this, but does anyone here actually use their garage for its original purpose? It's amazing how straightforward getting going on a cold morning is if you do.
No scraping, no need for heated screens, warm water, defrosting sprays, freeing wipers, no waiting - just get in, start up and drive out. Best of all - no wasting fuel. Close the door with your remote and you're off.
Simples!
As with most modern builds our garage is too small for anything larger than a supermini. It's something that should be regulated against. A garage on a family sized four bed home like ours should have a garage large enough to at least take a family sized hatch and get the doors open on one side. So sadly it's now full of bikes and junk. I wouldn't have minded paying a few thousand extra for the luxury of having a proper man cave to hide in.
|
I have a 1.5 size detached garage here and it's still difficult to get the car in and get the door open because it's full of other stuff that tends to get put in garages.
|
|
As with most modern builds our garage is too small for anything larger than a supermini. It's something that should be regulated against. A garage on a family sized four bed home like ours should have a garage large enough to at least take a family sized hatch and get the doors open on one side. So sadly it's now full of bikes and junk. I wouldn't have minded paying a few thousand extra for the luxury of having a proper man cave to hide in.
It is "regulated" - there's no requirement for any property to have a garage - there isn't even a requirement to have a parking space per property.
There was a time when planning regulations had a minimum no of spaces required, based on number of bedrooms for new builds - our 1976 4-bedroom house was required to have 2, increased later to 3 but then abandoned.
Many modern properties are being built with fewer than one communal space per property.
|
Many modern properties are being built with fewer than one communal space per property.
Yep - as an engineer who works in Construction, I can attest to that - one project I've been working on had 50 spaces for 94 properties, many of which were 3, 4 and 5 bedroom flats. Just what exactly do the planning authrorities think teenagers will do at 17 - get public transport until they move out for every trip? I can understand in central London and similar large cities, but in more suburban and rural towns, this is utterly stupid, as local public transport is woeful and isn't suitable for many journeys (my journey to work takes 30-40 mins by car and 1hr minimum by train/walk [forget the bus]).
On the 14yo development where I live, many 4 bed properties (and all 5 bed ones, all town houses) have only two spaces max, many only having 1 plus a small garage (very little space in the house for storage - small rooms), some even having just one parking space!
There is a mix of houses (all town houses) and flats (each with one allocated space, many with two occupants) and only 29 visitor spaces (no road parking - too narrow [deliberately done as we're near the station]) for 136 properties. Needless to say many people try and get away with moving in with more cars than spaces, hence the need for (private) parking control.
Very few (house) residents use their garages to actually store their cars (too small/used as a general storage space) - the only one I know who does stores their precious Ferrari 308GTB which appears about twice a year. Modern garages are a complete waste of time and not fit for purpose - I'd use one if I had one that was big enough - only the rich can afford bespoke ones than are ok for modern larger cars.
Sorry to go off-topic.
|
- only the rich can afford bespoke ones than are ok for modern larger cars.
Sorry to go off-topic.
Time to change the title of this thread?!
I'm not particularly 'rich' but I had to gouge a 3cm depression in the soft blockwork of the end wall of my integral garage (bespoke house only 7 yrs old) for the front of my Audi A8 so the door would close. And it's not even the LWB model!
It is a national shame that there is less liebensraum on modern private housing estates than there was on the big prewar council estates.
|
- only the rich can afford bespoke ones than are ok for modern larger cars.
Sorry to go off-topic.
Time to change the title of this thread?!
I'm not particularly 'rich' but I had to gouge a 3cm depression in the soft blockwork of the end wall of my integral garage (bespoke house only 7 yrs old) for the front of my Audi A8 so the door would close. And it's not even the LWB model!
It is a national shame that there is less liebensraum on modern private housing estates than there was on the big prewar council estates.
Garage size goes along with the standard car parking space 2.4m x 4.8m - both outdated for family cars, let alone larger ones.
|
|
|
"It is "regulated" - there's no requirement for any property to have a garage - there isn't even a requirement to have a parking space per property"
I was meaning that the size of any garage included on any planning application should be required to be large enough on a family home to take a family car.
|
I seem to recall it was Mr Prescott who took away the minimum requirements for parking spaces for dwelling type.
I dealt with one development the builder had a 4 bed detached house with a double length detached garage just behind, unfortunately it had a slight angle so was physically impossible to get a car in. As the buyer found out after they moved in!
Also had one council refuse application for garages with some flats as they said they would only be filled with junk, they had to be open cart lodges instead. Everyone agreed. As said should be a minimum width opening and depth to a garage otherwise pointless.
|
|
|
|
|
I hardly dare mention this, but does anyone here actually use their garage for its original purpose? It's amazing how straightforward getting going on a cold morning is if you do.
No scraping, no need for heated screens, warm water, defrosting sprays, freeing wipers, no waiting - just get in, start up and drive out. Best of all - no wasting fuel. Close the door with your remote and you're off.
Simples!
Well YES.
3 cars (mine, Mrs madf's and youngest son's), one lawnmower, 1 fridge, 1 deepfreeze 1 workbench, garden tools, beekeeping equipment, wood working equipment, car working tools and equipment, various beehives, garden shredder, various items of garden and beekeeping clothing. And a gas heater and various greenhouse heaters Plus a loft above..
|
|
Laziness and a feeling that the car is something to do with "work". Example--people get home in the evening all fed up from a stressful day and bad traffic, see a parking place in the street bang outside their home--bag that because they just cannot be bothered to put the car in the garage.
I saw a lady one cold morning come out of her house with unused garage-throw her stuff in the car-de-ice a mini section of her totally frosted front windscreen-then drive off. Luckily--with the sun being very low and straight in her face-she was forced to come to an almost immediate halt, whereupon she then got out of the car, leaving the engine running--rushed back into her house coming back with a litre of hot water which she poured all over the windsceen. By the time she got back in the car--it had frozen up again!
She should have used her garage-but I'm not going to tell her!
|
The worst example I have seen was on the M25 a few winters back, chap had only cleaned the 4" of snow off the screen. he braked and the layer of snow on his roof slide right down the screen like a roller blind. Cue stupid person driving with his head out the window at 10 mph trying to see where he was going.
|
One consideration for diesel owners of the earlier vintage is waiting for the heating plugs to work and the indicator lamp to go out.
Are these fitted on modern diesels as I rarely see drivers waiting before cranking the engine?
|
Yes they are, but most now do a pre-heat when the driver's door is opened. You still have to wait (or often the car waits by itself) to let the glow plug do its work, but this is usually less than a second.
|
COld mornings- I used to live north of Aberdeen and cheated by starting my car and leaving it running on the drive, to warm up and clear the screen, not the best way to do it I know, but it works. One morning I did my usual, jumped in drove off, and noted the car was still very cold. After about a mile I noticed that the nearly new Granada (with winter tyres) was not showing any temperature rise at all. I turned round and drove slowly home.
It turned out that the overnight temperature was about -20c, maybe more, and my engine coolant had froze. I got a lift to work and left the car. It warmedup later and I went home early and the car started and ran normally so I had a lucky escape.
Later that winter it took me six hours to travel back home, about 16 miles, due to the ongoing snowdrift across the roads. I was equipped with boots, coat hat and shovel, and we had a small team of commuters, at each snowdrift to clear the way so we could get home.
The next year I moved south, about 600 miles.
|
I used to live north of Aberdeen .
Blue Toon or the Broch ?
I was working in Peterhead in 71-72 and we knew when we were cut-off when the bus from Aberdeen didn't get through so those not living in the town just bedded-down on the floor of one of the Hotel bars rather than risk getting stuck - good trade for the bars!
I don't recall any specific issues starting my mk1 Escort 1100 but a later 1300 had issues with carburettor icing in winter.
During the bad winter of '83 I was commuting 100 miles a day to Northampton in a Hillman Imp - which was a nightmare when it froze as the long run forward to the heater remained frozen so the cabin was bitterly - no anti-freeze looking back!
|
I used to live North of Aberdeen : Near Macduff to be precise..
As a student I ran a 1955 Austin A35 with T&C tyres on the rear only. It went through snowdrifts very easily - Aberdeen to Stonehaven in 1968.. The following Rover 2000 got stuck. The benefits of narrow tyres.
Always changed coolant on cars so freezing was not an issue.. I have seen -25C one winter near Banchory in a Rover 820i.. (Horrible company car).. That was seriously cold - ice on inside of windows of car...
On Staffs Moorlands, we got very cold (-18c in 2011 and 2012) winters for England - lots of ice. RWD cars were undriveable before modern electronic aids..Managed a 180 degree spin in a BMW 318i at 15mph in 20cm of snow.
|
|
|
|
|