Typical Mail reporting using words like shocking, ploughed and smashed yet managing to omit key facts like how/why light was run.
Although the prosecution said it was borderline dangerous driving the charge was due care and attention. That almost certainly tells us it was not a deliberate act. Kids on the bus were messing with the bell. Distraction and/or looked but didn't see or something around sightlines or 'reading though' to next traffic light?
As Scot says autism is a wide ranging term and seems to have been introduced here as part of mitigation. Given he has three kids at 21 his autism doesn't seem to prevent him engaging socially with the opposite sex!! And, given the proportion of male population with some degree of autism it'd be problematic for it to be an automatic bar on a professional license.
And although it's no defence if the Peugeot driver's observation had been up to snuff they would have stopped short of the junction.
Edited by Bromptonaut on 26/09/2016 at 11:39
|