I am looking to buy a good sized SUV to replace a Honda CRV that I have recently had nothing but issues with (long story which I will not bore you with).
In looking at a few options I like the respective merits of the RAV4 and am pretty familiar, and comfortable with, Toyotas having owned a few of them. The one I am looking at is Invincible spec, 2.2 Auto, 14 plate with 17k on the clock, FSH and looks a nice car. Drives well.
The other option is one I don't know much about but that took me by surprise really in terms of its spec, size and practicality is the Outlander. Again its a 2.2 D-ID Auto, GX4 spec, with, if anything, a slightly nicer set of options than the RAV4 with sunroof etc which are nice to haves but not deal makers on their own. 14 plate and 19k miles with FSH.
Reviews on both cars seem to be favourable but wondered if there was anything about either (and particularly the Mitsubishi as I don't know them) to be wary of or that makes one significantly better than the other?
Having read extensively both seem to have very reliable engines and appear to be vehicles that will last as long as they are maintained correctly, There's no issue with that as I am fastidious with servicing and do an interim oil change at 6k myself so I'd expect long life from them.
I do around 17k miles a year mainly motorway with weekly return trips to Cumbria from Manchester so no likely issues with DPFs etc (I hope).
The draw with the RAV is the remaining warranty and I have always found Toyota dealers to be generally good and helpful. I do have a local Mitsubish dealer but have never dealt with them.
So, any experience or thoughts on them?
Thanks in advance and enjoy the weekend.
|