I have to question : why on earth suffer depreciation, servicing, insurance, car tax, etc. on TWO cars which seem to be very similar. Esepcially if you're only looking at a total of 8-10k miles a year for the two put together.
I could almost understand it if you were running (for example) a sports car, and wanted a 4*4 for bad weather / hobbies / rural winter roads, but running 2 bog-standard hatchbacks just seems to be throwing money away.
If you're adamant on a VW but hate saloons (and I can understand that, I find saloon boots to be mostly useless, then might I suggest the Golf estate. Other (very similar) cars are also available from VAG, namely the SEAT Leon possibly in the ST estate version), along with others. They'd be considerably cheaper than a Golf for what is basically the same car with a different badge.
Alternatively, the Toyota Auris is Golf-sized. The 'Touring Sports' (estate to the rest of us) looks very nice. Toyota also have considerably better warranty than VW.
|