Hi-
We bought an 04 plate XC90 in Feb 2012 with 65000 miles for £10k. It's been a great car and fairly trouble-free apart from suspension work (bushes, arms, ARB links, etc) which I suspect are down to a combination of age and the godawful roads around these parts.
It's now on nearly 120k miles. It's tatty but probably nothing that a massive valet wouldn't fix. I think it shows its age in the ride though - it feels a bit vague, a bit ponderous, a bit wandery, so thinking of replacing it.
The requirement is for a 7 seat 4x4. I looked at alternatives like Kia Sorento (new ones nice but too and heard bad things about build quality regarding older ones), BMW X5 (back row seats too small). I hate Discoveries, and the Land Cruisers are crazy expensive. That seems to leave the XC90 as the best choice.
Looking in our target price (£10-11k) I found one that is 58 plate with 81k miles for £11k. Has a towbar and right size wheels to fit my snow tyres.
But just having a moment of thinking is it crazy to pay £7.5k difference to get a car that is 4 years and 40k miles younger? Would I be better taking the risk on the one we have? Or would I be better trying to find a bit more money and going slightly newer?
I guess the answer is that the that cost of nearly 2k per year depreciation is just the cost of owning a big 4x4 like that and you have to suck it up. Would love to know others' thoughts!
Thanks.
|