Which all-wheel drive is best for efficiency?
I am torn between a 2004 Subaru Forester X AWD 2.5 and a 2005 Nissan X-trail 4WD 2.5. I want to know which is more fuel efficient; a constant AWD like the Subaru or a car which the driver can alternate between two-wheel and four-wheel drive?
Asked on 29 March 2016 by Chazdadka

Both os these are fairly juicy due to being 2.5 litre fours. Real MPG shows 27.8 for the X-Trail 2.5 and 26mpg for the Forester 2.5. www.honestjohn.co.uk/realmpg/subaru/forester-2002
Similar questions

We are looking to buy a used SUV with four-wheel drive. We don't plan to do serious off-roading, but will use the vehicle for ski trips to the mountains. As a result, the car must be comfortable for motorways...

I am looking to buy an economical 4x4 that needs to be able to tow 2000kg, but also double up as my commuting vehicle - I do around 50 miles a day for work. I have around £10,000-£12,000 to spend. What...

I am thinking about buying a used 2012 Audi Q3, 2.0 TFSi Quattro (71,000 miles). What are the kind of things to look out for before buying one of these?
Related models
.jpg?width=115&height=75&rmode=crop)
Excellent, honest vehicle, decent to drive on road and best in class off road. Better than original Freelander.
.jpg?width=115&height=75&rmode=crop)
Very useful off-road yet an enjoyable car-like drive on tarmac. Looks and feels classier than its predecessor. Well built. Owners rate it.