Many thanks for that. You obviously have a proper sense of justice. But I would not have run the email at all had I not been made aware of numerous instances of cooked up 'evidence' when drivers were doing no more than scratch their ears. A lot more have now come out of the woodwork. The simple answer is to make it a requirement that, unless the driver admits the offence (because he was on the phone), then the case must be proven by photographic evidence or by phone records.