What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
Differences in fuel (diesel) quality and so impact on fuel consumption
HI. I have been running a Mini Cooper SD Coupe (2102 with 2k to 7k miles) for the past 5 months. I have alternated the use of 6 fuels to see if any brand makes a difference to fuel consumption - it does! I do the same type of driving every week, and refuel to the 'brim' for consistency. The mileometer checked against a motorway 'measured mile', and found to be dead accurate. The on board computer is very good also.
The results, each over a tank full of around 375 miles: BP & BP Ultimate: 47.68 Shell & Shell V Power: 49.0 Esso: 51.57 Texaco: 52.54
The worst performing fuel were the most expensive, ie Shell V Power and BP Ultimate. The best was Texaco, every time, you could immediately see the improvement on the computer readout.
Quite surprising variation, but the results were consistent, and each tank full was filled randomly, so not weather/conditions affected etc.
Have you or anyone else noticed these quite significant variations in consumption based on type of fuel used? I know that you favour V Power but it did nothing in the Mini apart from cost more!
The car is now sold and I intend to do the same in a VW Golf GTD, which immediately seems more fuel efficient than the Mini, in spite of the manufacturers fuel figures which suggest the opposite might be the case?
The results, each over a tank full of around 375 miles: BP & BP Ultimate: 47.68 Shell & Shell V Power: 49.0 Esso: 51.57 Texaco: 52.54
The worst performing fuel were the most expensive, ie Shell V Power and BP Ultimate. The best was Texaco, every time, you could immediately see the improvement on the computer readout.
Quite surprising variation, but the results were consistent, and each tank full was filled randomly, so not weather/conditions affected etc.
Have you or anyone else noticed these quite significant variations in consumption based on type of fuel used? I know that you favour V Power but it did nothing in the Mini apart from cost more!
The car is now sold and I intend to do the same in a VW Golf GTD, which immediately seems more fuel efficient than the Mini, in spite of the manufacturers fuel figures which suggest the opposite might be the case?
Asked on 12 July 2013 by frayle
Answered by
Honest John
Sometimes a heavier fuel can give better economy, but the price of that is the carbon deposit it leaves in the engine. And yours was not a completely fair test because some residue always remains of the previous fuel. 50mpg is fairly normal for a MINI SD coupe, which isn't brilliant compared to the 63mpg I averaged over 7,000 miles in a 320dED with basically the same N47 engine. I switched from Shell Fuelsave to Shell V-Power Nitro+ and saw an improvement of 6.8%, then 9% after a few tankfulls of Nitro+. So at 5.7% more cost it more than pay for itself.
www.honestjohn.co.uk/road-tests/mini/mini-coupe-sd.../
www.honestjohn.co.uk/our-cars/bmw-f30-320d-ed/
www.honestjohn.co.uk/road-tests/mini/mini-coupe-sd.../
www.honestjohn.co.uk/our-cars/bmw-f30-320d-ed/
Tags:
technical issues
Similar questions
I have been quoted a high fee for an infotainment software subscription on my Dacia Sandero. Will the system and reversing camera still work if I refuse the update?
My wife has the Toyota C-HR Hybrid and we have just returned from a long holiday (11 weeks) and the battery is flat. Would a solar charger be sufficient to keep the battery in good order? Does the C-HR...
Does the Citreon C1 (2009 model) have timing chains or belts?